YouTube's Algorithm is Terrible For All Creators, not Just Online Ones

Do you guys remember back in the day when you could look up on YouTube and find videos on some of the most obscure nonsense ever? Like, watching a movie review on the fourth Karate Kid movie, or a video game review on some unlicensed NES Game that nobody ever heard of, or some foreign cartoon that never made it in the U.S. but was still somewhat decent. Have you ever noticed that now most YouTube creators tend to be making videos based more on trends and things that have become or were always really popular? Is there any reason that the Nostalgia Critic is reviewing the Peter Jackson Lord of the Rings movies outside of the fact that they would get a lot of views? Has AVGN done a review of a lesser known game since Hudson Hawk? Maybe My Horse Prince, but that is an outlier in a sea of Garfield, SimCity and Final Fantasy 6 Reviews. You ever wonder why this kind of stuff is happening? Of course you probably haven't, because the answer has been talked about by everyone from controversial YouTubers to nobodies on the most obscure Social Media platform; YouTube has changed, and that change is bad for all artists and creators, not just online ones.

Obviously, we know why the YouTube algorithm is bad for online creators, it rewards monotony and content theft while punishing original work and obscure topics. I'm sure all those rappers who react to ERB and Freshy Kanal make great music, but the majority of people only watch their react videos, no judgement. If you're a media reviewer then the algorithm will punish you if you decide to talk about an obscure property that you hold absolutely dear to your heart. It makes sense why people make those videos that will do well, YouTube is a business and a job for many people, they have to talk about what will get them a lot of views. The problem with this is that it encourages content farms, YouTube channels that make three or more videos a day or have a dozen or so other channels that do pretty much the same thing, think 5-Minute Crafts or WatchMojo. These channels are able to pump out content because they take less effort and have bigger teams than Joe-Schmoe-Body-o'No with only 1000 subscribers.

However, I also want to stress that this algorithm is not just bad for the YouTube creators, it's just as bad, arguably even more, for other creators; filmmakers, game developers, musicians, animators, comic creators, the works. I realize that this does not seem like something worth complaining about, after all film studios spend thousands, upwards of millions on advertising, as do game studios. Plus, it isn't like the music industry is suffering from a garbage algorithm withholding their paychecks, Disney isn't losing money over YouTube deciding not to push their latest upload. Yes, the studios aren't going to suffer because of YouTube's algorithm, because the studios aren't people, they are corporations that don't have the capacity of suffering. No, the real people who will suffer are the artists who make the content for the corporations to hoard money from, especially indie creators.

Let me create a hypothetical; say you're a game developer, and you're spending months on this passion project video game. You don't have any money to afford a team so you create everything by hand, the sprites, the music, the coding, everything. It's heavily inspired by the games you loved growing up and know there are still demand for even though they really don't make them anymore, and you put a lot of attention to detail into this game, what elements to take from your favourite games, and which ones to leave behind. After years of work, you finally release your game to an astounding zero fanfare. Nobody talks about your game, very few people actually buy your game, and by the time it gains traction as a cult hit, the algorithm will have moved on to something completely different.

I've learned about so many weird movies thanks to online reviewers, Movies like Freaked, Raggedy Ann & Andy: A Musical Adventure, Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings, and The Room. Games like Klonoa, Harvest Moon: Animal Parade, Remington Super Slam Hunting: Africa, The Stanley Parable,  Thief Simulator, and of course I can't forget the mention Stardew Valley. Other things like The Legend of Calmity Jane and Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century, the Legend of Zelda Manga, all of these things were stuff that was introduced to me via online reviewers and content creators. For a lot of people, the internet is where one learns about media that interests them, everyone from reviewers to comedians to countdown artists, all of these lesser known, up and coming, or cult classic pieces of media that ultimately would have just been forgotten and now have been given a second life. Now it's all replaced with brand sponsorship deals and the popular seeking out the popular.

The internet used to be a fantastic place to learn about this movie that had zero staying power but was completely up your alley, because that is the kind of place YouTube used to be. A lot of this does have to fall on the shoulders of how YouTube is used nowadays, we don't really subscribe to personalities or characters, we subscribe to content, so who cares that this critic is talking about a pilot to an internet animated series that is full of promise? They aren't talking about The Amazing Digital Circus. Recently, some BlueSky users have been criticizing Saberspark for seeing the Snow White remake in theatres while the new Looney Tunes movie, The Day The Earth Blew Up, was hardly mentioned by him. However, to play devil's advocate a little bit, what do you think will get more views? The highly talked about, controversial and rage-baiting Disney movie, or the Looney Tunes movie that has stakes only certain people seem to care about. I'm sure Saberspark would have much preferred to watch and talk about The Day The Earth Blew Up, but between the two movies, one is very clearly the one more people will view. This is not speculation either, I can back this up, Doug Walker made a video about both movies, and in six days the video about The Day The Earth Blew Up got 39K views, while in half that time the video on Snow White got 138K views. (As of writing on March 24, 2025)

I can kind of see why it's becoming more popular for studios and companies to just completely remove stuff from streaming because it's not getting the views, because why spend money on something that is not going to be popular? YouTube is the same thing, why push this video that isn't getting any views when this video could get us more ad revenue? This is why it was surprising to many that Disney extended Elemental's theatrical run, and that move paid off because Elemental was a sleeper hit. However, Disney can pull that off because they're a multi-billion dollar company that can take a hit like that. Imagine if the company behind Flow did that, they'd be bankrupt before making a second movie. Funny enough, I can only find videos talking about Flow after it won the Golden Globe, which says to me that the movie would have been relegated to cult status if it wasn't an award show darling.

My ultimate point here is that, because YouTube's algorithm does not encourage branching out and discussing lesser known properties, a lot of creators are going to suffer. Indie creators depend largely on word of mouth and if that is unable to spread then that project ends up unfinished or completely rushed to finish it. We need YouTubers to talk about lesser known media, up and coming projects that show promise and cult classics that deserve re-evaluation, and the great thing is that the power to change this is in our hands. Encourage your favourite media reviewers to talk about obscure things, and actively watch those videos when they come out, don't just stick them in your watch later bin and forget about them. Be aware of content farms and never be afraid to re-watch a video you've seen before. It's also important to share and talk about things you're into, not just online but in person too, which is why video stores and comic shops are great places to check out. YouTube's push for popular content is bad for everyone, so let's do something about it.

Is There a Place For Physical Media to Return?

Many people who talk about and discuss things like video games, movies and TV shows online have all probably had the same thought once or twice; "Why is this thing I like not on any streaming service?", truly it is a question that perplexes many. Companies are taking shows and movies off of streaming for... really no real reason and some things are just being put onto some random and unnecessary service for again, no real reason. The amount of streaming services has just made what was once a convenient alternative become the very thing it was the alternative to; Streaming is the new cable. This annoying disregard for consumer convenience and poor treatment of popular shows and movies has made people reminisce about the days of physical media, which all begs the question, can it come back?

Physical media refers mostly to releases of media on physical formats, most notably CDs, DVDs and Blu-Rays, also this 4K Ultra stuff, I dunno what that's about, and vinyl records, those have made a comeback. Of course, Physical media has its limitations, discs of any kind are fragile, prone to scratching and degrade over time. That all being said, I remember back in the day you would have a lot of really cool things on DVDs. I remember being just as transfixed on the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory DVD menu, watching a chocolate bar go through the factory being made and tested by the oompa-loompas, or going through the menus on the Red Dwarf DVDs to find the Easter Eggs. Now a-days, DVD menus are just sad, a singular splash image that is usually just a stock image or the DVD cover image and if you're lucky it will have some music. When I watched Wonder Park for my review, I was taken aback by the fact it had an animated intro for the main menu, you just don't see that anymore.

Menus weren't the only cool thing on DVDs though, you also had commentary tracks, sometimes they put interactive games on there, or even other cool bonuses, with some of my favourites including seeing a Red Dwarf episode reversed, as the gimmick was that the crew were stranded on an Earth that was going backwards in time, and on a Fraggle Rock DVD if you answered every question correctly on a quiz you got some bonus episodes of the Fraggle Rock Animated Series... okay that prize was not worth it but it was still cool. These are the kind of things that a lot of people miss about physical media, that and the fact that when you buy it you actually own it outright, which a lot of digital distribution store-fronts are really bad with, treating their services more like online rental shops where the return date is "Vaguely in the future".

So with all of this in mind, is there a place for physical media to come back? I think the answer is... no, because it never really went anywhere. Yes, most people are using digital storefronts and streaming services instead of buying physical media, however, physical media isn't dead. You will still find DVDs and Blu-rays out in stores, a new format was released nine years ago in 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray, and again, vinyl records have made a comeback. The question really is not if there is a place for physical media to come back, the question is if there is a place for physical media to become as big as it used to be, and the answer to that I think is... maybe.

The big problem is that, of course, media of any kind is expensive. You would probably think that something on a digital storefront would be cheaper, and in some cases it is, but I'm sorry, 50 dollars is a lot to spend on a game on Steam, I mean it's a lot to spend on one game in general, but especially on Steam where you don't have to make-up material costs of making a disc, game case and game manual, even if games no longer come with manuals anymore. The reality is that spending a monthly fee for nearly unlimited access to movies and TV Shows sounds like a better deal that buying a hundred dollar piece of hardware and a 20-40 dollar DVD or Blu-ray of one movie or 100 dollars or more for a boxset of one TV show. Physical media also takes up physical space, and as someone who has a lot of video tapes, DVDs and music CDs, it can add up over time, which is a benefit of only having digital stuff as it only takes up digital space.

Of course, there is also piracy, but I would never (Wink) recommend my readers (wink) to pirate their media (wink). In all seriousness, piracy has become a major problem in the streaming era, well "problem" in quotation marks it really only effects the CEOs and shareholders, largely because of the unpredictability of streaming. This show or movie you love could be taken down from the streaming service you have any day and placed on a streaming service you don't have and don't want to pay for, if it comes back to streaming at all. Look, I don't care what Disney says, Prop Culture was one of the best docuseries on Disney+ and taking it down with no plans to put it back was was a terrible thing to do. Nobody wants to admit that the best way to deal with piracy is to make media easier to access, because that would imply that investing in D.R.M.s and SecuROM nonsense would be a waste of money.

That all being said, I think the main thing that keeps people on streaming services is just the simple fact that for the most-part, they don't want that extra content. Most people don't want DVD commentaries, or bonus games or fully-animated menu screens, they want the movie and the option to change the language and subtitles, everything else is not a bonus, it's unnecessary, like a rug on a carpet. So, how do we rectify this? The short answer is I don't know, streaming has completely changed the way we watch movies and especially TV Shows now, to the point where I really don't think that physical media will ever really be as big as it used to be. That all being said and done, it's not like there aren't people who still want physical media, if only for the ability to actually own something you purchase instead of having your ownership of a product decided by a corporation, and collectors are always looking for things to add to their collections. I think the best solution is that, if you prefer physical media you should go out and buy it if you can, and don't be afraid to cancel your subscriptions to any streaming service, missing out on something does not have to be a bad thing. Physical media never went anywhere, it just stopped being as popular as it used to be.

Also if anyone knows where I can find a Video copy of the 1977 Raggedy Ann & Andy movie I would be really happy, I think it would look great next to my other Raggedy Ann VHS Tapes.

Shrek 5 Looks Different, and that is okay... for now.

Once again, Shrek has got his big green ogre fingers choke-holding the attention of the internet, though this time it is for less positive, but still highly meme-able reasons. The announcement of the fifth movie in the Shrek series has come with a new artstyle and to say that fans are not happy is an understatement. The change in artstyle has sparked outcry with people even calling for fans to do the "Ugly Sonic Treatment" to try and get DreamWorks to change the artstyle back to the original. Despite the fact that people have absolutely learned the wrong lesson from Sonic, one must wonder why such a decision has caused such a reaction.

So, what does this new artstyle look like and why is it a noticeable departure? DreamWorks was releasing 3D animated movies in a time where Disney was still pretty dedicated to more traditional 2D animated films, though Pixar was definitely marking a shift for the company as their features were becoming more successful and popular than Disney's 2D features. Pixar's animation style has always been Disney adjacent, bright colours and very clean, DreamWorks on the other hand had a much darker and grungier style in their 3D features, right from the very beginning. Pixar gave their ants bright blue colours, while DreamWorks gave them more realistic reddish-browns, but the ultimate example of the difference between the two companies is, as you have probably guessed, Shrek.

Shrek was a fairy-tale movie that did not look like anything Disney was putting out. While the movie could be quite colourful, it wasn't the bright shiny colours of Pixar, and it was the usual kind of grungy and gross that DreamWorks was more known for. This style aided the writing of the movie, which was a satire on Disney's classic princess films and the Disney renaissance. However, things have been slowly changing over the years. While Disney and Pixar still do their bright and colourful films, there is a noticeable shift in styles. You'll notice that they aren't afraid to use more muted or mundane colours, or even darker colours. Onward was a fantasy movie set in a modern human-esque world, and the colour palette reflected that. Lightyear was entirely set on a grey-brown alien planet, Raya and the Last Dragon had moments in dull dry deserts. While Disney and Pixar can and do still make movies like Elemental or Wish, movies with a more colourful palette and artstyle, it's clear that they are branching out into something much different.

I think this is where the change in artstyle comes from, now that Disney is making the more realistic looking 3D movies, what is the movie franchise that satirized Disney going to do? It reminds me a lot of the Sega-Nintendo rivalry in the 90s where the Genesis was the hot new console with a 16-Bit processor and its slogan was "Genesis Does What Nintendon't", highlighting the difference between the Genesis and the 8-Bit Nintendo Entertainment System, with the Genesis releasing in America two years before the Super Nintendo did. When the Super Nintendo did come out, something had to change, Nintendo had their own 16-Bit console, just like how Disney has their own realistic 3D animation style, so Shrek is being given a more cartoony style, and not many people like it.

Personally, I do have to wonder why the change in artstyle now, especially when the previous movie in the Shrek franchise, Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, looked amazing with the more standard artstyle, even though it did noticeably take influence from other stylized animated films like Spider-Verse. It definitely feels like a rash decision made for attention rather than anything else. Of course the change in style is not completely without merit, but there was no warm-up to this change so it felt absolutely jarring. Of course, this would be fine if something improved, and the big problem is that, for the most part, it looks the same. It does not appear to be any kind of big leap forward in artstyle or technological evolution, it looks like a DreamWorks movie, just more cartoony. If there was a noticeable improvement in artstyle or technology, I don't think fans would be as upset with the change in artstyle, but as far as we can tell, it isn't.

I'm not going to sit here and say this artstyle change is bad or even unnecessary, but I can see why people think it is. There was no build-up to this change, the previous Puss in Boots movie looked phenomenal, there does not appear to be any improvement that coincides with the change, and it does feel like DreamWorks is trying to differentiate itself from Disney and Pixar without much thought. Personally, I am interested in seeing what this new artstyle brings, but I will be honest when I say that they are going to have to prove that this change was necessary. I don't think it looks bad at all, but if they can't justify this change in artstyle, than whether it looks good or not in irrelevant. DreamWorks, this is your chance to step up and prove us wrong, unlike what happened with Ruby Gillman.

Flow won the Oscar... What does this mean?

I think it's safe to say that the Oscars have never really had a lot of respect towards animation. To date, only three animated movies have been nominated for Best Feature, none of them winning, and the Best Animated Feature category always feels like an after thought. For example, in 2006, three movies were nominated for Best Animated Feature, Monster House, Cars, and the winner, Happy Feet. Granted 2006 does not seem like a... great year for animated cinema, but this was the year we got Flushed Away, The Girl Who Leapt Through Time, Overt the Hedge, Paprika, and A Scanner Darkly, there definitely were more movies to at least nominate. There was a lot of discourse in the 2010s about how bad the Academy treated animation, and it seemed like that was going to carry over into the 2020s.

In comes 2022, once again, 2022 was a phenomenal year for animated cinema, Turning Red, The Sea Beast, Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, Marcell the Shell with Shoes On, Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio, I did not pick those movies out at random, those were the nominees for Best Animated Feature at the 95th Academy Awards, and the crazy thing is, even though there absolutely were some snubs, I am not at all upset about any of them. Sure, The Bad Guys, Apollo 10½, The Bob's Burgers Movie, Charlotte, My Father's Dragon, all of them could have, and some might argue should have, been nominated, but at the end of the day, this was an absolutely solid selection of nominees, but honestly, the winner was kind of obvious. Seriously, if anyone was expecting Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio to not walk away with the award, then I don't know what to tell you.

I think it was 2023 where the first "Real Surprise" in this category happened, as Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, the movie that swept the Annie Awards, lost to The Boy and the Heron, which is a pretty big surprise considering. Okay, it's not like if Robot Dreams walked away with the award, that would have been huge, but it's still pretty surprising that the Academy did not choose the super popular movie that everyone was raving about, or the Disney movie. This culminates into the 97th Academy Awards where the Robot Dreams level movie actually did win the award. While The Wild Robot was the super popular movie everyone was talking about, and Inside Out 2 was the Disney movie, Flow was the dark horse candidate that I literally did not anticipate winning the award.

I feel that a lot of it comes from two things, firstly the already established view the Academy has towards animation, but secondly, the absolute bore that the Annie Awards have kind of become lately. I haven't talked about this much, but the last two Annie Awards have been kind of boring, not the shows themselves they were as entertaining as any other award show, but the winners were boring. Across the Spider-Verse and The Wild Robot were not bad movies, but were they really good enough to sweep every category they were nominated for? I think one or two other movies deserved some of those awards personally. Regardless, it's kind of giving the feeling that they want the safe pick, like yes The Wild Robot deserved the Best Animated Feature Annie, but I don't think anyone would have been upset if Vengeance Most Fowl or even Inside Out 2 won. Winning the Annie just kind of feels unimportant now, but Flow winning the Oscar? That is huge.

So, what does this mean? Well, I don't think this is going to begin a huge shift for the Oscars, I believe at some point they are going to go back to awarding the safe and predictable option, but I do think this means something for cinema. Let's not forget, Flow is not just an animated movie, it's an independent, foreign animated movie, a foreign animated movie that isn't from the U.K. or Japan, it's Latvian, a country that has no foothold in American pop culture, and it beat The Wild Robot and Inside Out 2, that is a pretty big deal. Like, the Best Animated Feature Oscar isn't really a "Major Award", but it does matter to people, it's not like Best Documentary Feature Film category, people do care about it. I don't think it's hard to imagine a future where this win is a major catalyst for change in animation, Indie projects not only becoming more common, but also becoming more ambitious, foreign animated projects being put out there to seek an audience. I think with Flow's Oscar win, and the increasing popularity and accessibility of internet content, we're going to see a new golden age of independent content, the likes of which to surpass both video rental stores and public access television.

Of course, there is always the possibility that I am wrong, maybe nothing happens, Flow's victory was a fluke and the award goes to Illumination next time, but I think things are already changing. Dana Terrace, creator of The Owl House, is working on a project with Glitch Productions, the studio behind Murder Drones and The Amazing Digital Circus, Flow has already been added to the Criterion Collection, it seems to me that change is inevitable, maybe more independent movies will win major awards, maybe the Academy will have their own independent categories. Arguably this has already happened in video games, so it's only a matter of time before it happens to animation, and I think the real question is, are we truly prepared for that?

Analyzing The Simpsons: Is Bart Simpson Actually "Cool"?

We all know who The Simpson family members are as characters. Homer is the dimwitted but ultimately loving father, Marge is the caring but no-nonsense housewife, Lisa is the smart and principled daughter, Maggie is the surprisingly competent baby, and Bart is the cool, trouble-making son. However, is that actually true? I stand by most of what I say about Homer Simpson, I think that beneath his callousness, he is still a good person who cares deeply about his family, and I would love to make a whole analysis on as to why I believe that. However, there has been someone else in the Simpson family that absolutely mystifies me, someone who has such an established persona that I'm no entirely sure is accurate to who the character is. It's time I ask this question in earnest, let's take a page out of Super Eyepatch Wolf and TheRealJims and talk Simpsons; Is Bart Simpson inherently a cool kid?

Now, to begin with, it will be important to define the word "Cool". What is "Cool"? There are a lot of definitions for the word "Cool" which range to unfriendliness, calmness and the temperature. The "cool" definition we're going for is the aesthetic one. Described as "Being compatible with admirable social norms of society or a group of people" by the Oxford English Dictionary, or at least, by Wikipedia sourcing the Oxford English Dictionary. This definition is going to be the big point of contention for this argument, because the perception of what is "Cool" varies from not only group to group, but also person to person. So, it will be good to analyze the kind of culture that Bart Simpson wants to fit in.

First and foremost, Bart Simpson is a rebel, he is someone who likes to act different from the crowd. This is showcased especially in "Bart's Inner Child", where he finds that once everyone starts acting like he does, he is not as fond of it as he thought. This is because, at his core, Bart Simpson wants to stand out, he wants to be noticed. In "Summer of 4 Ft. 2", when Bart sees Lisa trying to make new friends, he does a whole routine to get their attention, even sabotaging Lisa out of jealousy. It's very much in Bart's character that when attention is taken away from him, he doesn't always handle it well. This is why Bart constantly has to pull bigger and more destructive pranks, because the old cherry bomb in the toilet would get old, so to keep the attention on him, he has to do more outrageous things.

On my Tumblr, I put up a poll where I asked this question. Tumblr can be a fantastic place for communities and fandoms, but it is also a total hellhole of a website, plus the poll only got nineteen votes anyway so take it with a grain of salt. On the poll, I gave three options, "Absolutely" Bart is inherently cool, "Well... Kinda" Bart isn't cool, but has his moments, and "No, he's a dork", which should be self-explanatory. Out of the nineteen votes, the majority of voters, 47.4% of them, said "Well... Kinda", falling into the middle where Bart does have his moments of being cool, but overall isn't really a cool kid. 36.8% of voters thought that Bart is inherently cool, while a minority, 15.8% of voters, voted that Bart isn't cool, and he's a dork. To be absolutely clear, I don't vote in my own polls, largely because I want the results to surprise me, and I can't really say I'm surprised by these results. Even if I had one hundred votes, or even a thousand votes, I expect the results would be rather similar, with most people taking the middle ground, but a larger majority saying that Bart is cool. The irritating part of it is that I specifically put "(Explain)" in the options because I wanted to hear people's opinions, and there were only two comments that gave one sentence explanations, and I'm pretty sure one is a role-play blog.

So it's clear that a majority of people do, on some level, think that Bart is a cool kid, and I can see why. Remember, The Simpsons was a big part of the pop culture of the 1990s, so Bart encapsulated a lot of the clichés and stereotypes of disenfranchised youths. Bart was not afraid to disrespect authority, be it his principal, his father, or whoever he sets his mind on. However, I don't think that inherently makes anyone "Cool", being a rebel is not just how you respond to something, but how you stand for something. Bart will pull pranks, do graffiti, put cherry bombs in toilets, but when push comes to shove, he still goes to Church with his family, even though he openly dislikes it and thinks it's rubbish. What I'm saying is, I don't think Bart is actually cool at all, he very clearly does what he does for attention, not for any other reason. He may take a stand for something, sometimes, but more often than not, he's doing something solely for the attention he receives from it.

This may have changed in later seasons, I'm not exactly TheRealJims or The Simpsons Theory over here, but my view of the character is that, he only causes trouble because it gets him attention that he craves. Bart is very much the kind of person who would openly mock a pop-star one minute, and then become their biggest fan the minute they become cool to like. Bart may be a rebel, but he still follows a crowd because that is where the most eyes will be on him, and I don't think that is particularly cool. I think being "cool" is a lot about being true to yourself, but also standing for principles, and being willing to stick to those despite how much others try to beat you back into conformity. When people are mocking you for being Vegetarian, or are trying to force you back into Christianity when you left, and you stand by your principles to defy them, that is what I think is genuinely cool. What I'm saying is, I think Lisa is actually cooler than Bart is.

It's kind of ironic in a sense, Bart, the bad boy rebel who skateboards and disrespects authority is the uncool kid, while Lisa, the over achieving nerd who has few regular friends and spends most of her time alone is the actual cool one. However, that is only ironic on a superficial level, if it's ironic at all, look the word "Irony" is thrown around so much in analysis that it's kind of lost any meaning. Regardless, the point I'm making here is that Bart is really only cool on a surface level.

I think that saying Bart is a "Dork" is a bit much, like I wouldn't put him in the same league as Milhouse. That being said, Bart comes off as someone who is very conscious about his image, so he'll only try something new if others encourage it. Bart is someone who could very easily slip into that "loser" role, become someone who is washed up and desperate for attention. If we were to use an analogy, I see Bart as a YouTube channel that has millions of subscribers, but the content is just kind of bland and same-y, while Lisa is a more specialized niche channel that has large gaps between uploads, but the content is engaging and gets genuine engagement. In other words, Bart is a MrBeast while Lisa is a DefunctLand.

In some respects, I don't think this revelation is really that shocking, there are lots of moments where we get a glimpse behind the curtain of Bart. I think even the writers kind of pegged Bart as a follower in a rebel's jacket from the start, as seen in "The Telltale Head", where Bart almost proudly shows that he cut the head off the Jebediah Springfield Statue, until the bully trio start saying they're going to beat up the person that did it. It makes sense that Bart does things that he thinks will get him the most attention. Really, the idea that Bart is not as cool as he thinks he is, probably isn't that new of a concept, I mean his best friend is Milhouse of all people, the ultimate follower. It kind of says something when hanging out with Martin is an upgrade. I wouldn't go so far as to call Bart a "Poser", mostly because that word is like "Irony" in that it's been thrown around so much it's lost all meaning, but also because I do think Bart does genuinely enjoy the things he does, but it seems like that is more of a perk to doing them than anything else.

Bart Simpson is not a cool kid, that is the main argument I'm making, that is the opinion I am expressing. However, I think the main takeaway here is, Bart isn't uncool because of the things he does, he's uncool because he does things for essentially the wrong reasons. It kind of reminds me of when influencers or celebrities make a statement, there is a difference between Conrad Veidt mandating in his contracts that any Nazi he portrays has to be a villain, and Madonna making the "American Life" album, one is an actor making a demand that others have to follow because of something he believes in, the other is a musician who is making claims and statements to drum up attention and controversy to keep the spotlight on them for just a little bit longer. Bart Simpson is an attention seeking kid who does things predominately for the kind of attention he would get from it, and I don't think that makes him cool. Still, he's cooler than Milhouse, so that's got to be worth something, right?

The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023) - A Fun and Decent Quality Movie by Illumination

2023 was not a bad year for animated movies, I mean it had Nimona and Across the Spider-Verse as big releases, it couldn't be bad. The thing is, it was just kind of a... quiet year? It was very clear that the pandemic projects were starting to wrap up and if anything began work during 2020 or 2021, this was the last year we would see any of that. 2022 was just absolutely full of releases that everyone was going crazy over, and 2023 definitely had a lot of those as well, by comparison it felt much quieter, of course 2024 was also quiet by comparison so we'll have to see what 2025 brings us. I think doing my best list of 2023 was largely easy to do, because the top five was comprised of two movies I really loved, two movies I liked a lot, and one movie I really respected. There was, however, one movie I did not put on that list, and one might wonder why. Was it simply because I hate the studio that made it? Was it because it was not actually that good? Was it for any other reason other than that I wanted to give a shoutout to Elemental? Well, let's take a look; This is my review of The Super Mario Bros. Movie.

The plot follows Mario as he and Luigi are sucked into the Mushroom Kingdom via a pipe they found while secretly fixing the Brooklyn Water System. Luigi gets dropped in the lands under the control of Bowser, who has stolen a power star in order to get Princess Peach to marry him, but Mario has teamed up with the Princess and a brave little Toad to gather the Kong army to fight back against Bowser and save Luigi. I think the best thing about this plot is that it very much is in spirit of the video games. I could very easily imagine a Super Mario game that is a lot like this movie's plot, something akin to Super Mario World, Super Mario Bros. 3D World, and maybe a reverse of Mario is Missing. I think the big fault of many video game movies is that they can often deviate too much from the initial video games in spirit, but I feel this movie manages to within the spirit of the Mario games.

I think most of the characters are the same, close in spirit to the games. Luigi is still your scared of everything coward, Bowser is still your lovesick villain, of course Mario did not have much of a personality in the games, other than that guy who will always help out with a smile on his face because that is what he likes to do. They definitely fleshed out Mario a lot more here, and I like it. They also took a lot of influence from other sources for Peach, she reminds me a lot of the Super Mario Adventures comics that were originally published in Nintendo Power. Overall, the characters are good, the ones that are similar to their game counterparts are well-done, and the ones who do deviate are still recognizable. However, I think the voice cast is the biggest part of these characters, specifically one Chris Pratt. Honestly, I think we are so used to Mario's cartoony Italian voice that we probably would not have been too accepting of any voice actor in his role, though there probably had to be picks we would be more accepting of than Chris Pratt. I dunno, my biggest issue with Pratt is that he's just given roles he is not best suited for, but I think he does an okay job here.

The rest of the voice cast are definitely much better cast, Anya Taylor-Joy captures the determination, excitability and authoritativeness of Princess Peach (those were a lot of big words), Charlie Day definitely captures that timid nature of Luigi, and I don't think there could have been any better casting for Donkey Kong than Seth Rogen. My biggest criticism for the voice acting, as I've said before, goes to Jack Black as Bowser. He does a fine job, but his singing voice is too close to his normal singing voice for me to separate the two, and later in the movie he sounds more like Jim Cummings as Pete, I like Jack Black, the Kung Fu Panda movies I think are some of his finest work, so I think this was more of a direction thing than an actor thing. However, one place I can give credit to is the voice cameos, everyone talks about Charles Martinet's roles, a character who represents the original Mario design, and Mario's father, and those are very fitting roles for him. I also noticed Scott Menville in one scene, and it's always difficult for me to hear him voice anyone, because the first thing I immediately think when I hear him is Robin from Teen Titans.

Before I forget, I did like the music of the movie. You will hear a lot of classic Mario tunes integrated into the movie's score, and I was one of the many people who cheered when they heard the DK Rap in the movie.

When it comes to animation, I'll be honest... I think Illumination was the best studio to make this movie. I know how that sounds, but Pixar and DreamWorks both have this very noticeable and recognizable style, both of which are more focused on realistic movement and texturing. I think the cartoony world of the Super Mario Bros. games truly did benefit from a studio that is more known for Cartoony and Stylized looking animation. It might sound weird, or look weird, that I'm praising Illumination, but my gripes with them were never about animation, mostly. I was always eyeing them for their stories and that they never seemed to really reach for much with their movies. I don't think they make entirely bad movies, but by the same token I don't think they make entirely great movies either. Animation wise, sure they started off kind of basic, but I do think they've gotten better, and my biggest example of that? The Super Mario Bros. Movie, which is bright, colourful, expressive and full of life. So, is this Illumination's lone "Great" Movie?

The Super Mario Bros. Movie is good, absolutely. The story is good, the characters are good, the animation is good, what is holding it back? I think a lot of it is that the movie is simple and only really takes risks as a product and not as a movie. It's kind of hard to really love a movie like this unless it is really damn good, Transformers One was really good, but it also came out in a bit of a dead year for animated cinema. I don't think it really is the fault of the movie that I can't say that it's one of the best animated movies ever, I think it's more the year it came out and the track record of the studio behind it. It's easy to be the best when everything around you doesn't try. That being said, I do think The Super Mario Bros. Movie is good, Illumination's animation style does suit the Mario world perfectly, the casting is pretty good, and frankly, it was just nice to get a good movie with Mario in it, so for what it's worth, I do think this movie warrants a viewing, if only for being one of the few, if not only, Illumination movies I can say is better than alright.

Hey, It's Almost Time for the Annie Awards!

Alright, by now you should know the drill, the Annie Awards are announced, I'm going to give my opinion on them, I'm gonna be wrong come awards night, nobody will actually care. To be fair, I do love sharing my predictions because I just have that gambling urge, and since I'm not putting any money on these predictions, I never technically lose. In all seriousness, this is my third year giving Annie Award predictions, and I enjoy doing this because, really for the same reason people enjoy making predictions about the Oscars or the Grammys or the Emmys or what-not, because we do genuinely love a lot of the things that are being nominated, and we have a deep love for cinema or music or animation, so we want to share that love in the ways we know and enjoy; through competition.

If you're new, my format for this is pretty easy to grasp, I introduce each category and give my thoughts on the nominees, which one I think will win, which one I'd like to see win, and which one I think is the least likely to get the award. I only cover the categories for features because, first off those are the ones I actually have opinions on, and secondly, if I did the other categories this blog would be a slog to read through. Of course, I also want to stress that I don't honestly care all that much, I've said it before and I'll say it again, awards don't typically mean that much. Last year, Across the Spider-Verse practically swept the ceremony, but Nimona is still the better movie, fight me. With that said, let's get to the good stuff.

BEST FEATURE

All in all, a fairly strong selection of nominees this year. I think the only nominee that I don't see winning is That Christmas, which to be fair I haven't seen. I also haven't seen Inside Out 2, but I think it has a decently strong case to walk away with this award, it has a better case than Kung Fu Panda 4 does anyway. I liked Kung Fu Panda 4, but let's be real, it's only winning this award as a fluke, especially compared to The Wild Robot. If I had to put money on any one movie winning this award, it would be The Wild Robot. Ultraman: Rising is also a decently strong one, but I just thought the movie was okay at best. If I had to really give them a ranking, Inside Out 2 would be in third place for most likely to win this award, Kung Fu Panda 4 would be fifth, That Christmas would be sixth, The Wild Robot would be first, Ultraman: Rising would be fourth, and that leaves second place to Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl. It wouldn't be unprecedented, Curse of the Were-Rabbit won in 2005, it also won the Best Animated Feature Film at the 78th Academy Awards, won nine other Annie Awards, won the Best British Film award at the British Academy Film Awards, like it just won a whole lot of awards, like Wallace & Gromit absolutely collect at award shows, A Grand Day Out and A Matter of Loaf and Death were the only Wallace & Gromit short films to not win the Best Animated Short Film Oscar, and A Grand Day Out was still beaten by a different Nick Park short film. I'm just saying, The Wild Robot is the safe bet, Wallace & Gromit is the easy next pick.

 BEST FEATURE - INDEPENDENT

So, as usual I didn't actually see a whole lot of these movies. I saw Flow, and that was it. To be fair, it won the Golden Globe for Best Animated Feature Film, and it won a whole bunch of other awards, so I think it's a fairly safe bet that Flow will win. If I had to pick my next pick, I've heard good things about Memoirs of a Snail, so I think I'll go with that. I haven't seen, or even really heard of, the other nominees, but I'm sure they're all worthy of the award.

BEST FX - FEATURE

Let's see, Kung Fu Panda 4? Not likely to win this award. Moana 2, even less likely. Frankly, I think the Annie Awards are just giving lip service to Disney sometimes. The Wild Robot is very much likely to take home this award, and I can also see Ultraman: Rising walking away with it. Though, I'm actually going out on a limb and going to say that the safe bet is Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl. Again, Wallace & Gromit just collect awards, but also when it comes to visual effects, Aardman usually gets a lot of good praise, so I'm going to pick Wallace & Gromit as my safe bet for this category.

BEST CHARACTER ANIMATION - FEATURE

Again, I think Wallace & Gromit has a good chance with this one, again it's because of Aardman. However, I think I'm gonna give the safe bet to The Wild Robot, but frankly I thin it could go to either movie really. I'm kind of impressed Kung Fu Panda 4 is getting a lot of nominations too, it just feels like pitting The Great Khali against The Big Show, like you know which is the better movie of the two immediately. Actually, I think a more apt comparison would be Giant Gonzalez against The Big Show, but that's getting into wrestling history and you're not here for that. Also, Inside Out 2 and Moana 2 are also nominated, I'll give Inside Out 2 third place again.

BEST CHARACTER ANIMATION - LIVE ACTION

Every year I talk about this one for a throw-away that I'm only kind of half-serious about. Still would have loved to live in a universe where I can factually say "Annie Award winning movie Cocaine Bear", but I digress. I think I'll give the safe bet to Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes.

BEST CHARACTER DESIGN - FEATURE

For once, Inside Out 2 is no longer the third most likely to win this award, it has graduated all the way up to second most likely to win this award. Yeah, I don't imagine that many movies are going to win against The Wild Robot, but to be fair, I don't think there really is a "Safe Bet" so to speak for this category, not because all the movies in this category are worthy of the award, but because this one really is down to a matter of taste. That Christmas is also nominated, shame I didn't check that one out. There is also Spellbound which... I can kind of see it walking away with this award, but it doesn't look like anything special. Finally, there is a movie called "Scarygirl" that is nominated and it looks... Well, this is for character design so maybe.

BEST DIRECTION - FEATURE

Chicken for Linda! is our first nominee and... yeah I haven't even heard of this movie, it won a couple of awards, only losing on three nominations, so that's impressive. I'll have to add this movie to my... growing list of movies to check out. Flow is also nominated, and I can see this one taking home the award, the direction of this movie was really good. That Christmas gets another nomination, was it really that good? Of course, I think The Wild Robot is going to be the safe bet, that and Wallace & Gromit as well. I'm not saying it's unlikely that Flow or even Chicken for Linda will get this award, but Chris Sanders and Nick Park are established names in the industry so it's going to be pretty big if they both lose to an Indie film, and frankly it would be kind of amazing.

BEST MUSIC - FEATURE

Hmm, I haven't seen that awful Lord of the Rings movie show up here yet, not complaining, just thought it was worth noting. There's always that one movie you think is going to get some nominations but is almost completely ignored (cough Wish cough). Anyway, we have another movie I haven't heard of here, Kensuke's Kingdom. Piece By Piece also gets its first nominee here, and... I dunno, this one kind of feels like cheating. That Christmas gets another nominee, there is also always that one movie that just gets a lot of nominations. Again, I think the safe pick is The Wild Robot, followed by Wallace & Gromit. I think this is the most thought I've ever put into this category so far.

BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN - FEATURE

Umm... Call me crazy, but I don't think there is really one "Safe Bet" here, I mean sure The Wild Robot is obvious, but it shares the bench with Inside Out 2, Ultraman: Rising and Wallace & Gromit, I think the only safe bet is that That Christmas won't be taking home the award.

BEST STORYBOARDING - FEAUTRE

Holy wow, Despicable Me 4 has a nominee? As does Saving Bikini Bottom? They must have really been desperate to fill this one. It says something when I genuinely think the safest bet here is That Christmas, because Moana 2 and Spellbound do not come off as Annie award winners to me, but I haven't seen either of them so what would I know? I just know that this award might be the least interesting to many viewers.

BEST VOICE ACTING - FEATURE

Mélinée Leclerc gets a nomination for her performance in Chicken for Linda, Maya Hawke gets a nod for Anxiety in Inside Out 2, The Wild Robot has two nominees this year, Lupita Nyong'o as Roz and Kit Connor as Brightbill, and Brian Tyree Henry has a nod for Megatron in Transformers One. Is this really the first nomination Transformers One has? Fascinating. Anyway, I think The Wild Robot is the safe bet again, but Inside Out 2 might be the next pick for me.

BEST WRITING - FEATURE

Wow, Flow got nominated for the category? That is hilarious, wouldn't it be absolutely funny is the movie with no dialogue got this award? And yes, I know that writing doesn't just mean dialogue, but it's heavily associated with dialogue at the very least. Other nominees include Inside Out 2, Kensuke's Kingdom and Memoirs of a Snail. I think I'll take a risk and suggest Memoirs of a Snail will win this award, but that is very much not the safe bet pick here.

BEST EDITORIAL - FEATURE

Oh this category, I never like predicting for this category. Let's see, we have Inside Out 2, Moana 2, The Wild Robot, Ultraman: Rising and Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl. Umm... The Wild Robot, maybe Wallace & Gromit, I don't want to come off as a fanboy championing a movie that has little chance, but like... Ultraman wasn't that good and I didn't watch Inside Out 2, and I have zero interest in anything Moana related, so I wouldn't have any opinions on that.

I think because 2024 was just kind of a "meh" year for animated cinema, the awards do kind of have to nominate the same handful of movies for each category this year. Like, I don't think Kung Fu Panda 4 was bad, but I don't think it will walk away with any awards this ceremony. Same with things like Ultraman, Moana 2, and seriously, how the Hell did Saving Bikini Bottom and Despicable Me 4 get a nomination? How did Transformers One only get one nomination? Okay, to be fair, Transformers One isn't exactly the kind of movie that award ceremonies would be lauding, but still, it could get thrown a bone for Storyboarding? The second worst SpongeBob movie and the most mediocre Illumination movie were more worthy of that award than Transformers One? Anyway, I don't expect The Wild Robot to be a total sweeper like Across the Spider-Verse was, but at the same time, I would not be surprised if it was.

Wallace & Gromit: Where Vengeance Succeeds and Were-Rabbit Fails

I have said it before, I am a huge fan of Wallace & Gromit. They were an instrumental part in shaping my love for animation. As a kid, you really enjoy the slapstick and goofy gags, but as an adult, you really do appreciate the cinematography and the writing, as well as the slapstick and goofy gags. So I, like many fans of the Claymation duo, was pretty excited to see that they were not only getting a new feature film, but there would also be a returning villain from the shorts. True, I did have some reservations, avoiding the trailers meant that I was not going to have an opinion on Ben Whitehead until I actually watched the movie, and, y'know there is always that bit of hesitation when a movie for an old I.P. is announced, like that voice in the back of your mind that keeps saying "They better not have messed this up, they better not have messed this up!" and it's always there at the back of your mind. So, with all that said, what did I think of the new Wallace & Gromit movie, "Vengeance Most Fowl"?

I think it's better than Curse of the Were-Rabbit to be honest. Curse of the Were-Rabbit was not bad, but it did have a few shortcomings that really kept me from fully loving it. While I don't fully love Vengeance either, I think with a few more watches I might grow to.

First thing I want to talk about is the movie on its own merits, because I do want to discuss why I think it's good on it's own before I compare it to the previous movie. Vengeance Most Fowl is almost like a love letter to Wallace & Gromit fans in places, lots of small references like Feathers McGraw clicking on the Moon for a Captcha asking about cheese, because the moon is canonically cheese in the Wallace & Gromit universe, or even the farmer from Shaun the Sheep cameoing, they're all really cute nods that aren't intrusive to newcomers. They are exactly as a nod to fans should be, something cute that fans will chuckle at without constantly winking to the audience. On top of that, I do think Ben Whitehead did a good job replacing the late Peter Sallis, I mean he did so in the Tell-Tale games, which I haven't played that much of, but I think he did a really good job in the movie. Plus, the cinematography of this movie, Feathers McGraw was the perfect antagonist to bring back because the camera and lighting work perfectly to make this adorable little penguin one of the most intimidating villains on screen, which is a joke in and of itself. Plus, I really like the diversity of the movie, they don't bring major attention to the fact that Wallace has an Indian neighbour, or that the new police character is also likely Indian or Arab, it just is a thing that is accepted, and that's great.

So, why do I think it's better than Curse of the Were-Rabbit? Well first off, my biggest problem with Were-Rabbit was that, when the third act rolled around, it wasn't as fun as the first two acts, and I believe that is largely because in act three, Wallace & Gromit became just Gromit. Gromit is a fantastic character, don't get me wrong, but a lot of the entertainment and comedy from Gromit comes from his interactions with other characters, and Gromit didn't really interact that much with others in most of Act Three of Were-Rabbit. Here, Gromit is very rarely far from a character to interact with, Wallace, Feathers, even the new Gnome Robot gets some good scenes with him. The scene where Gromit is spying on Feathers as he escapes the zoo, only for Feathers to look his way and wave him off, that was really good.

On the topic of Feathers, yeah, there is a reason he is one of most beloved characters in the Wallace & Gromit franchise, the immediate joke of such an adorable little penguin being treated as such an intimidating presence is, on its own incredibly hilarious. This movie really ups that joke with great camera work and character animation. Matt Groening, in A Grand Night In: The Story of Aardman, called the introduction of Feather McGraw in The Wrong Trousers "Hitchcockian" even noting a specific scene that he has always wanted to ape from The Simpsons. Just imagine, all that admiration from a thirty-minute short film. I can see an argument being made that it's a lot more heavy handed now, where as there was a simple elegance to the introduction in The Wrong Trousers, but I think that it fits. Again, the joke is just so fantastic, there are genuine moments that I was laughing because of how well they played their cards in making this penguin an intimidating menace.

Speaking of the visuals, I kind of prefer the look of this movie to Were-Rabbit too. It looked fantastic, don't get me wrong, but there is just something about Vengeance's animation that vibes with me better. It genuinely felt like perfect middle ground between the original short films and feature length polish, I don't know how to explain it. I think the only nitpick I have with the animation is this very obviously CG explosion at the end of the climax, which looked rather out of place and uncanny. I get why they did it though, it was undoubtedly much easier, possibly cheaper, to do it in CG than to do it all in Claymation, but it just didn't mesh. Still, that is like, the one nitpick of this movie's visual look, the movie looks fantastic, polished and just as charming as the original short films.

I don't want this blog to come off as "Now that this movie is out, Curse of the Were-Rabbit is no longer worth watching" because that simply isn't true. Were-Rabbit is still a really good movie, it just had a few shortcomings that I think Vengeance Most Fowl managed to evade. Both movies are still really good, but if I had to pick which one was better, I would have to pick Vengeance Most Fowl. I feel like Were-Rabbit tried to be a lot bigger than it needed to, while this one was just as big as it needed to be. Still, I must recommend watching the original short films first, just to get a good feel of what Wallace & Gromit is. I still think A Grand Day Out and The Wrong Trousers are the peak of Wallace & Gromit, but I'll admit, this one comes pretty close.

The BEST Animated Movies of 2024

So... I'm gonna be honest, 2024 sucked for animated movies. I have made my opinions clear on the matter, but let me state, now that the year is over, Two-Thousand-Twenty-Four Common Era absolutely SUCKED for animated movies, that isn't to say this was a totally bad year for animation entirely though, animation critics who, y'know actually do this for a living, or are just better than me, might be able to point you in directions I couldn't for things like TV animation, Anime, Indie Animation, Hell they might even be able to point you into directions to movies I haven't, couldn't, or wouldn't see. Basically what I'm saying is just because one area of the year wasn't great, doesn't mean the whole year was bad, and also please support other animation reviewers, we're a small community we need attention.

That all being said, this year wasn't a completely barren wasteland for movies either, it's just that... well, you're less likely to see them in theatres, I think. Most of the movies I heard of this year, were not theatrically released, The Tiger's Apprentice, the Megamind sequel, at least half of my worst list, all went directly to streaming in one form or another. This is a problem because it means accessibility to thee movies is very limited, so while really big movies might get a theatrical release, others that are still fairly notable might not. I'm not entirely convinced their isn't some other motive to putting movies directly on a streaming service, like other than a studio having full control over something, but it is kind of concerning.

Anyway, here are the movies that didn't completely suck.

5. Kung Fu Panda 4

I know not everybody has positive feelings for this movie, but I gotta be honest, I had a good time with it. I am always in awe about how well each Kung Fu Panda sequels feels like a natural step in the story being told, going from Po learning to become the Dragon Warrior and ending with Po having to pass on the title. Sure, it isn't as good as Kung Fu Panda 2 or 3, but those are immensely tough acts to follow, so the fact that it is good in general is good enough.

A lot of people also criticize the villain's backstory, saying that it makes no sense, I have wanted to talk about this for a while, but it does make a lot of sense that Po, a person who faced discrimination and prejudice in the Kung Fu circle due to his body, is facing a villain who also faced discrimination and prejudice in the Kung Fu circle against them due to their body, again, it's these links that make the Kung Fu Panda villains great.

No, the movie isn't perfect, I do miss the Furious Five as much as everyone else, the Mr. Beast cameo was kind of dumb, then again most YouTuber cameos in movies tend to age poorly, and I'm not entirely sure how I feel about Awkwafina as an actress, but over all, I had more positives with the movie than not, and James Hong and Bryan Cranston were easily the highlights of this movie, so that has to be worth something.

4. Piece By Piece

It might seem crazy what I'm about to say, but I never really got into Pharrell's music. It isn't all bad, but when you tend to gravitate more towards Alt. Rock and Metal, you do tend to miss out on some good stuff. That all being said, the idea of doing this documentary in Lego style intrigued me, not that animated documentaries haven't been done before, but doing it in Lego, why not?

I was ultimately more interested in how the story was told instead of what story was being told, but that isn't to say I don't think Pharrell is an interesting person, I'm just stating my biases as someone who isn't really into this kind of music. Still, the way a lot of the things were visualized, like the different beats that were produced and how they're stored, a lot of it really is complimented by the Lego visuals, and I don't think you could really do scenes like that in a traditional style. I think this is one of movies that does still make me hold onto hope that there are still unique animated movies out there, and I won't say this is one of the most unique or risky movies, but this was an idea, and not a bad one at that. I can't really say more about it, this was just a good movie.

3. The Wild Robot

I can hear it now, "The Wild Robot at Number Three? It should be Number One!" and yeah, I see why, this was a really beautifully done movie, easily one of DreamWorks' best in recent years. It's these kinds of movies that really do show how different DreamWorks is from studios like Disney or Illumination, and why they are my favourite of the big three.

That all being said, I am a little disappointed in this movie. I never read the book this movie was based on, though I might give it a shot in the future, my disappointment comes from one thing; from the initial trailer, I thought this movie was gonna be a really powerful movie told with zero dialogue, imagine DreamWorks taking a risk like that, making a movie with zero spoken dialogue with such a grand scale that their best movies have, that would be so cool. I'm not going to say that this movie failed to live up to my expectations in terms of quality, if anything, when I learned it was going to have dialogue I grew a bit worried, so the movie exceeded my expectations. Still, I think it would have been cool if this movie had no spoken dialogue.

2. Flow

Flow is the movie I thought I was going to get out of The Wild Robot, a truly unique and risky animated feature. Flow was such an interesting movie, there is zero spoken dialogue, not even subtitles, and yet you can still infer what the characters are thinking, feeling, in some cases even saying. I love moments in movies and cartoons where the imagery tells the story more than the dialogue does, how the body language and facial expressions speak about the characters thoughts more so than can be put into words. Flow is entirely that, it's just reading the animals' body language.

On top of that, this movie got really tense at points, there were several moments I thought this poor cat was gonna drown or get eaten by something, and it always kept me on edge, it was fantastic. I also have to applaud the fact that the team used the open-source Blender to render this movie, which really does prove you can do fantastic things with available tools. Now we just have to wait for the animated movie where each and every frame was hand drawn in Microsoft Paint.

So, if this is my choice for the most unique animated movie of the year, why isn't it number one? Well... Maybe I didn't actually want The Wild Robot to have zero dialogue, because I think this movie is more fascinating than it is entertaining, and don't get me wrong, I think it's a great movie, but in the same way I think Fight Club or Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas are great movies, where there is just something fascinating about them, that keeps them in my mind, but very rarely do I ever think about actually watching them that often. I would love to re-watch Flow with friends, but it might not be one I watch that often. What movie would I watch more often?

1. Transformers One

If you were to tell me that a Transformers movie would top my list of best animated movies any year, I'd be open to the possibility. Even though I'm not huge into Transformers, I have a fondness for the franchise, the original Michael Bay movie completely blew my mind when I was a kid, and I'm not completely shocked that Transformers is still a popular franchise, but at the same time I was not a huge fan of the original 1980s Transformers movie, even putting it on the list of the worst animated movies I reviewed. So this is still a little bit of a shock.

It's also shocking because, is this movie unique? Not particularly. Is it groundbreaking? I don't think so. Is it a risky movie? Not in the slightest. You know what this movie is though? This movie is damn good, and in 2024, I needed a Damn Good movie, I love when a movie is unique and takes a risk, but I don't think 2024 needed that, I think 2024 needed movies that were good before they were risky or groundbreaking. 2024 needed a Transformers One, because everything else before it... No, not all of it was bad, but very few of it was better than "Okay", I know a lot of people like Ultraman Rising, and it wasn't bad, but it just felt pretty standard. Transformers One was the first movie of the year that I watched as thought, "Yeah, that was pretty good". What does that say about this year as a whole...

If I had to give a theme to the movies on this list, I would probably say... Ambitious? Each movie is taking a fairly risky step in one way or another, DreamWorks' best movies are often pretty risky in one way or another, Flow and Piece by Piece are certainly unique movies that are begging to attain a cult following, honestly, even Transformers One, the notion of making an animated Transformers movie after the Michael Bay movies, with Michael Bay as a producer, frankly I respect the gall. Was this year completely bad? I don't think so, but I also thought negative about 2022 and now I'm willingly looking back on that with rose-tinted glasses, maybe 2025 will be a different year, one with better and more interesting movies to talk about. Well, let us leave 2024 behind us, and look forward to something better... 2030! Yes, I'm talking about more than animated movies here, let's just move on to the Honourable Mentions.

1. Ultrama: Rising - I mean, it was okay, kind of predictable, but kinda cool seeing Ultraman get a fairly big push in the west.
2. Rotten: Behind the Foodfight - This doesn't count, it's a live-action documentary about an animated movie, but it is worth the mention.
3. Sonic the Hedgehog 3 - This also doesn't fully count, but if it did, it would easily be number one.

The WORST Animated Movies of 2024

How would I describe 2024 for animation? Well, that is kind of a meaningless question. As a whole, animation has had its ups and downs this year, and there was plenty of good stuff, like The Amazing Digital Circus, that was absolutely peak. LS Mark released the pilot to his new animated series this year, and that was pretty good. There was A New Wish, which I hear most people quite liked. Batman: Caped Crusader, which was... I mean it was alright. X-Men '97 has gotten some good attention, and there is probably quite a bit I am not mentioning, mostly because I just don't really have any time for animated shows, I barely have time for new movies, but I did watch quite a few, but I do want it known that I couldn't watch everything, so if you want a more thorough look at the Animated Cinema of 2024, I'm sure Animated Antic can give you that.

There really is no other way to say this, but for animated movies, 2024 sucked, and this will not be the last time I say that in 2024, I'm repeating myself a lot but I really don't know how else to word it. It's not that this line-up was completely bad, there were some good and unique pieces of animation this year. However, it's very clear that we are officially finished that wave of "Pandemic Ideas", ideas that were bred out of artists of many varieties finally being able to take a breather and let their creativity flow and allow them to work on and polish up something truly unique. It would almost be amusing that we have learned nothing from the pandemic if the world wasn't completely on fire, both metaphorically and practically literally.

Really, all this list really goes to prove is that I'm a miserable curmudgeon who wants to go back to the days of watching Disney VHS tapes and racing around to get my pajamas on and my teeth brushed before the previews were over, and that was awful. Still, 2024 is not over until the worst of the worst have been named and shamed, so let's get to it. Here are the worst animated movies of 2024. 

6. Despicable Me 4

Oh... we're starting this list off strong when Despicable Me 4 is only the bottom of the list. Really, this movie should be higher considering it's from my least liked studio, Illumination. Still, I can't be surprised this movie wasn't good, I mean, did we really expect them to start making masterpieces after The Super Mario Bros. Movie? It's not like they were suddenly gonna start making things that would actually rival Disney or DreamWorks, though movies like this don't help with the feeling that The Super Mario Bros. Movie was not a total fluke.

The big problem was that, they had a lot of ideas and just didn't flesh any of them out. The movie is mainly a combination of three major ideas, Gru goes into witness protection, Gru assists a young villain-to-be in pulling off a heist, and the Minions become superpowered, and then a bunch of smaller ideas that spring off of those three plots. Really, I think if they just picked one plot here, the movie would have been a Hell of a lot better, and picking one or another would give them the chance to flesh out some of these ideas. I like the idea of one of the characters having to lie about their identity while not wanting to lie, that is a good dilemma, but that goes nowhere. I also like the idea of Gru having to decide about whether he wants to have his family and his good guy image or if he does miss the thrill of villainy, but that ultimately does not happen. I'll say it again, if the movie was just Gru and Poppy or Gru and Maxime, it would have been much better, but they had to go with Gru and Poppy and Gru and Maxime and also Super Powered Minions because... we need a new way to get merch sales out of these giant sentient tic-tac mutants.

It's only number six on this list because... let's be real, it's an Illumination movie, and Illumination is pretty much incapable to making anything that's really worth getting angry at.

5. The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim

Easily the most disappointing movie on this list, if the only thing I took into consideration for this list was wasted potential, this would be number one, because there is almost a good movie creeping through here. Hell, I'd even go so far as to say there is a great movie hidden within, something to prove that the Lord of the Rings extended universe can be just as good as the Peter Jackson Trilogy. Instead, we got definitive proof that maybe the Tolkien estate should have kept the film rights under lock and key.

It's not even that there is one glaring issue that makes this whole movie suck, it's a bunch of small things that chip away at my enjoyment of the movie bit by but until the massive marble block is little more than a pile of rubble with a Squidward nose stuck to it. My biggest issue was the camera, they tried so many 360 shots and pans and all kinds of camera movement that half the time I swear I was watching The Gondor Witch Project instead, and it doesn't help that the animation just doesn't look right. I am going to say it, I think this movie has worse visuals that Ralph Bakshi's movie, because I'm not convinced that A.I. wasn't involved in this movie whatsoever. Characters look separate from the backgrounds as though they're greenscreen, which should not be a problem because this is 2D Anime inspired animation, but even then the characters are often too anime, Héra often looking more like a character out of Final Fantasy than Middle Earth. On top of that, she just isn't a good character, she's hyped up to be this badass character, but her God damn horse gets a more badass moment than she does, she really does fit the whole "Strong Female Lead TM" nonsense.

On top of that, it was just so anti-climactic, the antagonist gets killed by being choked with a shield, like come on, like their could have been something more to it, which would have made it more tragic too. Just a disappointing movie, and the archived recordings of the late Sir Christopher Lee do not help, yeah, you totally just added them for marketing hype, you printed that archived recordings were used and gave him a total of eleven lines. I really hope that we don't get anything more like this in the future.

4. The Garfield Movie

I think the main reason I can't say that this is the most disappointing movie of the year is that, I did kind of anticipate a middling, mediocre at best, but still watchable movie. Maybe it was just because Chris Pratt was involved, I dunno.

Really, the strengths of this movie is that, on some level, the crew behind it really did have some understanding of  Garfield, like this wasn't just a quick cash-in like some other Garfield movies were, but at the same time, it doesn't get as heavy or rough as some of the earlier Garfield specials did, or even as some of the comics did. Garfield saying goodbye to his mother is ten times the heart-breaking moment that anything in this movie, and they really do try, but it just didn't come together. Maybe with a better script something may have been decent, but it is kind of difficult to really do a decent Garfield anything when Garfield hasn't been good for a long time. The dry wit and sarcasm of the original strips long since been replaced and so are nowhere to be found in this movie, which sucks because there are moments that do almost, if not entirely, feel like Garfield.

It really is clear to me that Mark Dindal's strengths as a director do not like in movies like this, they lie in the zanier movies like Cats Don't Dance or The Emperor's New Groove, but even then, maybe not. Maybe those movies were just flukes, and The Garfield Movie might just prove it.

3. The Casagrandes Movie

On some level, writing these year end lists is easier for me than other reviews because I can just paraphrase or truncate any First Impressions that I have done, or expand upon any Social Media post I made. That being said, when a movie as completely boring and uninspired as this one comes out, really what else can I do?

I don't want to lift my original First Impressions word for word, but there are only so many ways I can say something is boring and doesn't put any new spin on old, tired jokes and clichés. I was finished with this movie when the ancient God was speaking in modern teenage slang, but I kept soldering on, because maybe this movie would have been somewhat watchable. Instead, it was the most boring animated movie of the year, and at one point I might have put it at the top of this list.

2. Saving Bikini Bottom: The Sandy Cheeks Movie

Frankly, I still think y'all are too harsh on this movie. No, it is not good on any level, but it is still better than Sponge on the Run, I mean do you guys remember Sponge on the Run? No, of course you don't, you remember zombie pirates with Snoop Dogg and Dany Trejo, Keanu Reeves in a Tumbleweed, Plankton Booty and Mr. Enter doing another Angry SpongeBob Review. Let me tell you, Sponge on the Run is the worst, because it does not feel like a SpongeBob movie, with the soundtrack full of modern popular acts (seriously the days of Ween and Motorhead cameoing in SpongeBob are over), attempts to satirize common animated movie tropes and moral about inner beauty or whatever... you know what all that reminds me of? Shrek, Sponge on the Run is a Shrek movie with SpongeBob's skin, and worse, it's not even a good Shrek movie in SpongeBob's skin.

With all that in mind, comparing it to a movie that didn't even feel like SpongeBob, what does this movie have? A line about SpongeBob not being able to watch his streaming shows? Uncanny live-action mixing? A weird moment where Sandy Cheeks gets DeviantArt Inflation put upon her? Yeah, really the worst thing about this movie is that even with all of that, this still isn't as bad as Sponge on the Run, there were moments here that did feel like SpongeBob, which I guess is more the shame all things considered. Really, it just falls under the category of "That Kind of Animated Movie", but even then only barely, and really it's only at number 2 because frankly, it's a much more interesting entry than The Casagrandes Movie. Still, I do think there is something that you can get somewhat upset with here, like SpongeBob means a lot to a lot of people and seeing stuff like this doesn't help. In any other year, I probably would have conceded to popular opinion and put this at number one, just because it would have given me the most to talk about, you know without the stigma of a good movie trying to break out of it like with The Lord of the Rings movie.

But this shockingly, was not just any other year, this was 2024 and 2024 gave us one massive surprise that we frankly should have seen coming, yet none of us did.

1. Where the Robots Grow

What, you didn't see this movie? Of course you haven't, at most, you watched Saberspark's video about it and promptly forgot it existed, lucky you.

Really, on principle this has to make number one, because the use of A.I. in creative spaces has truly been the death of creativity. A.I. is little more than legalized plagiarism stuck inside the uncanny valley, and the fact that any movie can be made with A.I., that just has to make it the worst animated movie of the year by default, doesn't it? I don't blame people for not watching it, why would anyone bother to watch a movie that nobody could be bothered to make? At least with the Lord of the Rings movie, I can convince myself that it was all done by human animators, I can believe it was all humans who made it. Really though, this is just giving the creator, or should I say the prompter, what they want, attention. They probably did hope that this was the movie that would make everyone change their mind about A.I. in creative spaces, or maybe they just wanted to show it can be done and get all the attention off of it, well guess what; No.

Come to think of it, I haven't actually watched this movie myself, really. Can I qualify it for this list if I didn't watch it? No joke, I seriously did not watch this movie before writing all of this about it, it is literally number one because it was made using A.I. and really that isn't entirely fair, is it? Can I put this movie on here by principle? Yes, the answer is yes. Yeah it isn't fair, but it also isn't fair that A.I. is being used to replace genuine creative talent while also stealing from said creative talent so I think it's fair game for everyone to call this the worst animated movie of 2024, even if they haven't actually watched it. I don't swear on this blogs, but ---- this movie, just for existing.

Well... that was fun, 2024 was not a great year for animated movies, but I am hoping that 2025 will be better. Like I said, I couldn't watch every animated movie this year, so while Megamind 2 and Mufasa: The Lion King would have been total shoe-ins for this list, sometimes I am just going to have to miss a few things. That being said, the big trend I notice in this batch of garbage is that, at the core of every movie here, there isn't a bad movie, except maybe for the A.I. movie, but honestly most of the movies here weren't even that infuriating, like I genuinely can't think of any real reason why to be mad at the existence of most of these movies, which is entirely why Where the Robots Grow was an easy number one entry. Really, 2024 was the year of the disappointment, where some movies just were not as good as they could have been.

Anyway, to round out the list, here are a few dishonorable mentions:

1. Orion and the Dark - I just did not enjoy this messy film, but I can see why some might like it.
2. Thelma the Unicorn - A very predictable and very mediocre movie, but harmless enough.
3. The Imaginary - This movie just... rubbed me the wrong way, would have been on the list if I actually got around to finishing it. Maybe I'll give it a review in 2026 or something, but no promises.