Old and Forgotten YouTube: Why The Microwave Show Could Never Exist In Modern Times

Author's Note: Look, I can't predict the future, if I knew that Disney was gonna do something terrible, which frankly is as safe a bet as you can possibly make, then I would have decided to wait and write about that. The problem with weekly posts is, when you have something ready by the deadline, you can't really replace it, and when you have time to write about it, it's no longer at the height of relevancy. So, to begin this post, I'm gonna state, for the record, screw you Disney, and Trans Rights!

End Author's Note

When I was a kid, YouTube was an entirely different beast than it is now, it really was the type of place where anything was available, and most of us used it to watch pirated TV Shows and movies, but there was original content, and if you thought YouTube could get weird today, well where do you think it came from? On some level I guess I do miss "Weird YouTube", some would argue we still have it in places, but what do we really have today? Don't Hug Me, I'm Scared? That began in 2011, plus, the animations of David Firth are way weirder. The Amazing Digital Circus? That's not weird, that makes tons of sense compared to compared to stuff like There Is Nothing or Olivier de Sagazan, "Transfiguration" performance. You think any of the big name YouTube stars are doing weird things, explain to me what the Hell Shay Saint John was. I should probably clarify here, "Weird YouTube" wasn't just spooky and unnerving stuff, it mostly became that because weird and spooky go hand in hand, but "Weird YouTube" was an era of YouTube when literally any dumb idea could take off, case in point, I have a question to ask you; Is It a Good Idea to Microwave This?

"Is It a Good Idea to Microwave This?", hereafter referred to as The Microwave Show (yes I did use "hereafter" to be pretentious), was a show that originally aired on July 1, 2007 created by director Jonathan Paula and host Jory Caron. The basic concept of the show was that they stuck a bunch of random crap in a microwave and filmed what happened, if anything happened at all. Then they would decide whether or not it was a good idea to do so. I'm not sure if they ever took this idea seriously but after a while the term "Good idea" and "Bad Idea" were kind of just punchlines, like you never really were meant to take this show super seriously, maybe Season 1, but that's really it. The show lasted for 10 seasons, ending in July, 2011 and it aired a few bonus episodes until August 2015. The many countless microwaves, weird experiments and the hosts Jory, Jon and the sidekick Riley Mcllwain are forever etched in the history of YouTube.

The Microwave Show was my eye opening experience to the wonders and possibilities of YouTube, the reason I got a YouTube channel was to watch an episode that was "Flagged" and so you had to be over a certain age to watch it, shockingly it wasn't the episode where they microwaved a condom. You can imagine that this show has some sentimental value to me, and you would probably expect me to say that this show needs to come back, and while I would love to see a return of The Microwave Show, I also have to concede to the point that maybe it's a good idea to not bring the show back.

Of course the first thing people will say is "You're just saying that because the edgy humour hasn't aged well" and, I mean some of it hasn't sure, but that's not the reason. Jon, Jory and Riley weren't working off of any scripts, so everything they said was improvised and off-the-cuff, so if they came back to do another season, I do think we'd get some different kinds of jokes out of them. Of course, the chances of them coming back to do another season are slim considering Jon and Riley both have families and they might not want to do something like this anymore.

The next thing you might say is "Oh you're saying it shouldn't come back because kids will imitate it even though YouTube is not solely meant for kids", and I will admit, that is a part of the reason. That being said, the guys were aware of how bad some of the stuff they did was, putting "Don't Try This At Home" warnings on some of their more dangerous experiments before making it a common feature in Season 7. I also remember there was an imitation on YouTube that was being uploaded around the same time, "What Happens When You Microwave This?" which was more or less the same idea, but without the Good Idea/Bad Idea thing. I would also be remiss if I did not mention this, but there was another alleged imitator who was uploading his own microwave videos onto YouTube, and during one experiment, started a fire that killed his mother. Jon himself talked about this situation on his secondary channel.

So yes, this has happened before, but it does highlight exactly the real reason I think this show should not come back. To put it bluntly, YouTube has changed.

I'm not saying that YouTube has changed in that, this kind of content is no longer allowed on the platform, I mean, The Slow Mo Guys have done several videos with explosives, firearms and sharp blades, so YouTube would still allow this kind of stuff on their site. No, YouTube has changed in the sense that it no longer has become about having that unique and weird idea that gets all the attention, but it's become a giant, globally scaled rat race, a rat race where following trends and making content farms has become more profitable than having unique ideas.

To be absolutely fair, this is not new to YouTube, the previously mentioned imitation shows still existed, particularly "What Happens When You Microwave This?" with one of their most notable episode being when they microwaved ten of the worst video games ever made. I think this show is mostly lost media now. However, there is difference here, these guys weren't making it a content farm or making any indication that what they were doing was a good idea. Really, the rise of the content farm has made YouTube a far more dangerous place for kids than Television or Video Games, because these content farms with their bright cheery music, colourful visuals and usage of smiling emojis will make things that are irrefutably dangerous and make them seem, like doable and fun ideas.

I really have to wonder how everyone feels about the legacy of The Microwave Show, because it genuinely was one of the shows that shaped original YouTube, it defined a bygone era of YouTube that we may never see again, but at the same time, the YouTube landscape has changed to the point where a show like this is a massive risk. While they might put "Don't Try This at Home" warnings on everything and mark their content as "Not For Kids", the content farms that steal from them might not, and they might get someone killed, someone else killed.

If you want a good channel talking about the dangers of content farms like 5-Minute Crafts, Australian YouTuber and Food Scientist Ann Reardon of How to Cook That does a lot of videos debunking bad and dangerous baking hacks from content farms, and I highly recommend these videos.

The Christmas Tree (1991) - The Worst Animated Holiday Special Ever

You know what I haven't done in a while? A "Technically" movie. I love doing these, because if I'm ever feeling burn-out or something, I can always rely on my old standard of "This technically counts". So, the AFI and BFI, those are the American and British Film Institutes, state that a film must be a minimum of forty minutes long to qualify as "Feature Length", so I have a stipulation that any movie that runs over forty minutes but is still under an hour falls under the category of "Technically", and boy was I excited to learn that this counted as a "Technically". I think most people who are in the animation or film review circles on the internet are aware of The Christmas Tree, one of the many animated products of the 1990s that somehow feels like a product of a much earlier time in animation. This movie has a reputation, and sometimes I love watching movies like that, because sometimes, you have to see a movie to really know how bad it actually is. Plan 9 From Outer Space? Not that bad. The Room? Pretty bad. Cat in the Hat? One of the best "So Bad It's Good" movies. Now, I get to scratch another one off my list, because at forty-two minutes, The Christmas Tree does qualify as "Feature Length".

This is one of those movies that I almost guarantee that most reviewers writing about it only sit through about the first ten minutes, because that is more time than you need to figure out every single issue with this movie, honestly the tricky part is where do I start because the problems become apparent with the title and opening credits. I don't normally comment on opening credits, because if you're watching a movie for the opening credits than you're watching it for the wrong reasons. However, I have to comment on this one because, like think of other Christmas specials and their opening credits, they have things like falling snow, winter landscapes, twinkling lights, maybe some cold blues or bright reds and greens. This movie just has a black background, and the music doesn't even have any kind of festive spirit to it, frankly I think that's just a bad omen, if your Christmas special doesn't even have the least bit of Christmas in its opening credits, than how's the rest of the movie going to fare?

Here's a criticism that I don't think anyone has brought up, this special feels like a Philips CD-i game, and I don't just means it looks like one, I mean genuinely it feels like a cheap, early 90s shovel-ware CD-ROM game, the editing, the voice acting, the audio editing, here's a tip for anyone who wants to get into audio editing, always have some kind of a gap between two pieces of recorded dialogue. Does that sound like something that everyone should know even if they're just an amateur screwing around in Audacity? Well, in many cases, you can hear instances where whoever was editing the audio just smashed two takes together without any kind of natural pause. And yeah, let's talk about that animation, because it really does look as cheap as it possibly could. Movement is limited and stilted, facial expressions are weird and uncanny, and lip syncing never matches the vocal track, not that that last point really matters since the voice acting is so awful, the kids are mumbling most of their words and the adults are putting zero enthusiasm into this.

I think the most frustrating thing about this is that the designs are not completely awful. All the kids look distinct from each other, Judy is a fine woman for the most part, and honestly, the backgrounds do look nice, they are the only thing I can look at and make the connection that this movie was made outside of the seventies. It does not convince me that this special wasn't originally meant to be an interactive storybook on CD-ROM though, because the story is undoubtedly the worst part of it all to me. Not the story itself, it's a pretty decent little short story that would make for a classic holiday special, but how the story is told. We get to the Christmas season at eleven minutes into the special and everything before that is just brought up and glossed over, like they want to establish these important plot details, but not actually spend any time to introduce them naturally. It really is just the cherry on top of this crap sundae, and I hate cherries.

I mean, what other rating can I give it except for "Avoid"? It is easily one of the worst animations I have ever seen, like what else is there? Friendship is Witchcraft? 12 oz. Mouse? That SpongeBob Episode where he adopts another pet that terrorizes Gary? Okay that last one may be worse, but this is still up there. It's just so incompetent, the editing, voice acting, animation, there is no quality to this product what-so-ever. One of my favourite critics, Todd in the Shadows, says "The worst is not always the most bad, sometimes it's the least good" and I can't think of anything that is "less good" than this. I almost want it to do something offensive, just to do something that will piss me off, but no, it's just really poorly made. I've seen some really poorly made movies, but I think this is the worst of them, The Misty Green Sky at least had something behind it, I could sense some kind of ambition to it. This has nothing, except the reputation, and I just can't recommend it on any level. This movie gets an avoid.

How to Train Your Dragon (2010) - An Unfortunate Victim of "Seinfeld is Unfunny"

So, you've probably heard something interesting about this movie. Actually, no, that's a bit misleading, it's not something about this movie specifically that is interesting, it's more something about a different movie that is also the same movie. How to Train Your Dragon is getting the "Live-Action Remake" treatment because... I have no clue why. Seriously, not only is this movie franchise not even twenty years old, but the last movie only came out roughly five years ago, then again Disney is giving Moana the same treatment even though similar can be said about that, really the whole Live-Action Remake trend is just absurd. However, let's pretend there are people who are interested in seeing the upcoming remake, and they want to know if the original is worth watching. So, let's strike while the iron is at a reasonably warm temperature, and let's look at How to Train Your Dragon.

The plot follows Hiccup, the young and not so incredible son of the Viking Stoick, chieftain of the village of Berk, which is frequently attacked by dragons. Hiccup is put to training in order to kill dragons, which is difficult because Hiccup is actually studying dragons, one particular dragon, a Night Fury named Toothless. I heard so much about this movie, I heard critics say it had such a different plot, that is avoided clichés, that is is such a heartbreaking tale, and all I have to say is, I'm sure it was in 2010. Look, the trope "Seinfeld is Unfunny" is about art and media that is hugely innovative and important to their genre, Seinfeld is a sitcom that most modern sitcoms take several cues and gags from, so someone who has grown up on sitcoms made after Seinfeld would go back to it and wonder why it was so innovative and popular. I feel like that is what is going on here for me, How to Train Your Dragon was unique and different for its time, but going back to it after movies like Encanto, Turning Red, Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, I see a lot of the influence of this movie in those. I shouldn't be to harsh on this movie for that, but the problem really is that for the first half or so of this movie, it is really standard. I think the reason it is so loved for not going in certain directions is because it made you believe that it was going to go in these directions, and so the first half is fairly standard. The problem is that, again, it's the "Seinfeld is Unfunny" trope, I imagine a lot of the people who worked on Puss in Boots: The Last Wish were decently influenced by this movie.

But okay, plot is not the saving grace of a movie, I mean I thought Klaus was horribly predictable but I still enjoyed it in the end, so let's talk about the characters. To be fair, the Klaus comparison is not ill-fitting, both movies have very visible character arcs where we can see how the characters move from point A to point B, Stoick gets praise for his character arc. I think my issue is that, these aren't very unique characters to begin with, Hiccup is your dorky protagonist, Astrid is your bad-ass female co-lead, Stoick is your gruff authority figure, like these aren't bad places to start for characters, there is a reason they are tropes, but they do kind of pigeonhole you into one or two arcs. It isn't that these characters are bad, and honestly it isn't even that they're generic that gets to me, it's the fact that the arcs are fairly predictable, like of course Hiccup is gonna end up taking charge of a team, and Stoick is gonna learn the error of his ways. Stoick and Hiccups relationship arc is wonderful, but compared to the later Encanto, it just kind of falls flat.

To be fair though, the animation is pretty solid, it's pretty standard DreamWorks animation, but I will say I absolutely love the fog, it really does make much of the environments look cold and almost lifeless, but for the most part it is pretty standard. To be absolutely fair though, there is one bit I absolutely loved in the movie, it's towards the end after the climax, and Hiccup is in bed and he sees that he lost a leg in the fight. His face and body language is perfect and then cutting to the shot of the floor, revealing his prosthetic was just a brilliant piece of storytelling, again, it is kind of standard, but when it is done well, it is done really well.

I'm actually kind of sad that I don't have better to say about this movie, it really isn't a bad movie, it's like Toy Story, on it's own it is a good movie, and a highly important one as well. I really can see how this movie influenced a lot of the animation landscape of the 2020s, especially in cinema. I really don't have much to say though, it's just an unfortunate victim of the "Seinfeld is Unfunny" trope. The plot is stuff I've seen, the characters are ones I've seen, and frankly I just think they've been done better. So uh... I guess that does mean I have no reason to want to see the live-action remake. Okay, you what, I'll extend an olive branch here, because I don't think I'll come back to this movie, but I can't say I don't recommend it on any level, again this movie is good at its core and it is influential in its own way, this movie became the start of one of DreamWorks' most notable franchises for a reason, so I do think it is worth seeing at least once, and hey, with the remake coming out, maybe more people will see it. At the very least, we can all agree, live-action remakes are unnecessary and bad!

The Bizarre Case of Banned Animated Movies Around the World

Why do people care so much about media being banned? Well, the answer is quite obvious I think, it's because art is a universal form of communication, so when a book, movie, video game or anything is banned it is essentially saying that the ideas and thoughts of the work are not welcome in the area. Sometimes though, bans can be put in place for okay reasons, like say an episode of a cartoon being banned from televised airings because it has a scene that contains rapidly flashing lights that could cause seizures in epileptic viewers, or maybe a certain streaming service will ban a creator from their platform because they're spouting hateful nonsense and spreading harmful misinformation, or maybe a media company puts out a list of things that maybe shouldn't be played or aired for a couple days during a national tragedy. Whether or not these things really count as "bans" is, a different conversation entirely, but the point I do want to make is that sometimes things aren't banned or "Soft banned" just because the government wants total control over what their people think, some things do get pulled for less frustrating reasons. Some things also get pulled for completely stupid reasons.

So I thought, why not have some fun and talk about a bunch of animated movies that have some ban history to them. Why? Partially for educational purposes, I mean this is still film history after all, but also because I want to have a laugh at the stupid things and dumb reasons that most banned lists give us. This isn't going to be a top ten list, I'm mostly going to go through these movies in alphabetical order and whenever I can I will be providing links to articles about these film bans, I do have to be some kind of journalist here after all. So, with all of that said, welcome to the Bizarre Case of Banned Animated Movies!

(Author's note - *Denotes any movie where hard confirmation of the film actually being banned in any way is dubious at best)

Abomniable

Really? Abominable was banned? Yes, yes it was, in three countries no less, but... when I tell you the countries that banned it, you might notice something interesting about them. See, Abominable was banned in Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines, and if you even vaguely know your geography, you can tell that all three of those countries have have shorelines in the South China Sea, an area which has several islands that are currently in dispute. See, China has a policy called the "Nine-Dash Line" policy which basically lays claim to those islands, and possibly the sea itself as well? What does this have to do with Abominable? Well, there is a brief scene where a map is displayed, that shows this Nine-Dash Line. Because this is disputed territory and this can be seen as supporting China's claim over the area, the three countries have called for the scene to be edited out, or censored, however because it was refused to cut the scene, the movie was pulled from theatres.

An American Tail: The Mystery of the Night Monster*

Really, direct to video movies are being banned now? Well, not exactly, this is one of the movies that has a ban in the United States, and American bans tends to be either very regional or strictly over one form of viewing, for example, this movie. It was apparently banned from airing on Universal Kids, a Children's Television Channel that launched in 2005, and they gave no reason as to why they wouldn't air it. Some speculate it's because there is a character who might be a minor that has a crush on a character that is supposed to be middle aged, and the channel might have considered that inappropriate. Funny enough though, Freeform, an American basic cable channel, actually aired the movie in 2019 with a TV-PG rating, so make of all of that what you will.

Coonskin

Well, here's our first adult animated movie, a Ralph Bakshi film too. Ralph Bakshi has a history of controversial animations, with things like Fritz the Cat and even Mighty Mouse: The New Adventures. An archived article on The New York Times from 1975 (linked above) details one of the biggest controversies this film received, allegations of racism! The Congress for Racial Equality or CORE dubbed the movie as racist and campaigned to stop the movie's release, which led to the production company Paramount choosing to no longer distribute the movie. It should be stated that the article does mention that some black people were not on CORE's side about the movie, and many will comment on Bakshi's satire in the film. Coonskin is a movie that many better animation reviewers, analysts and historians could talk about for ages, so I'm gonna cut it off here. What I will say is, if you find a copy on Home Video in the wild, even under the alternate titles "Bustin' Out" or "Street Fight", maybe it's worth holding on to.

Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba - To the Hashira Training

Of all the places to ban an Anime film, one of the last places I would expect would be The Bahamas, yes, Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba - To the Hashira Training, was banned in, of all places, The Bahamas. Why? Nobody is really sure, some have said that it's because the movie isn't in English, which is a dumb reason considering that the movie can be dubbed. So yeah, the Bahamas Plays and Film Control Board just banned this movie for... as far as anyone can really tell no actual reason. See, this is the stupid stuff that people like to see in ban lists.

Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba - To the Swordsmith Village

Well, here we have it, our first movie ban in the Middle East. I will not even begin to talk about the culture of the Middle East because I am very much ill-equipped to do so, but suffice to say we have a bunch of movie bans in the Middle East. To the Swordsmith Village was the second Demon Slayer movie, and it was banned in a couple Middle Eastern countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates banned this movie because of a scene where the character Mitsuri Kanroji is taking a bath. Of course, the Middle East in general has a problem with nudity and sexuality, so even a scene that is apparently not explicit can be seen as controversial. The sad thing is, this isn't even the weirdest ban for Demon Slayer.

Fairytale

What the heck is this movie? Well, Fairytale is a 2022 experimental adult movie by Alexander Sokurov, it was submitted to the 2022 Cannes Film Festival, and was scheduled to be screened at the Moscow Karo.Art festival but was denied a screening license. So, the movie was denied screening in Russia, and why? Again, no real reason is given, but if I had to make a guess, the movie is about Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini and Churchill in the afterlife, so... make of that what you will.

I should specify here that I'm not linking to any sources in this case, predominately because the sources are Russian, and I don't want to send people to any pro-Russia propaganda sites. The necessity of proper and sourced journalism is only upstaged by the necessity of due diligence.

Fantasia*

Yes, Fantasia was also banned at one point, in Ireland of all places. Why? Well, there are speculations, Wikipedia mentions that Fantasia had to be cut to remove the introduction of the Rite of Spring section, and it sources the book "Irish Film Censorship: A Cultural Journey from Silent Cinema to Internet Pornography" by Kevin Rockett. Others speculate it was because of segments like The Sorcerer's Apprentice or The Night on Bald Mountain being too much for the predominately Catholic Irish, some even speculate it's because of the infamous black centaur which I'd say is a bit of a stretch, I mean if Golliwog is still a thing in Britain, y'know?

Lightyear

Just when I thought I've finished talking about Lightyear, but yeah, this movie was banned too, in fourteen different countries no less. Predominately banned in Middle Eastern countries, as well as a few east Asian countries, for a brief lesbian kiss displayed in the movie that Disney refused to cut. Lightyear is banned in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Indonesia, Malaysia, Lebanon, Bahrain, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Turkey for this, even though apparently Kazakhstan has no laws criminalizing homosexuality in film. Due to the ban in Kazakhstan, it was also banned in Kyrgyzstan because their movies are distributed by Kazakhstan. I know this isn't exactly a popular Pixar movie, but I don't think even its biggest critics would say it warrants a ban.

The Lion King II: Simba's Pride*

Okay, this one may not be true, but I'm going to include it in case anyone has any information that I can't find. Apparently in the early 2000s, The Lion King II was pulled from television rotations for the subject matter. The problem is that I can't find any sources to back this up, the only source Wikipedia provides is a DVD review that can only be viewed on the WayBack Machine, and I don't think it makes any reference to it being pulled from TV, so I'm gonna label this one as "Dubious". If anyone has any information that can confirm or deny this one, please leave a comment.

The Mad Doctor

This is one of our first Short Films to be on the list. I should have kept it to feature length movies, but there is some interesting history with some of these short films, most notably one of, if not the most infamous Mickey Mouse short. If you know your history, you would know that The Mad Doctor was banned entirely in the United Kingdom, many theatres in the United States also refused to show it. However, I think the hilarious part about this film ban is that, apparently, Nazi Germany also banned it. Wikipedia sources the book "Hollywood Flatlands: Animation, Critical Theory and the Avant-garde" by Esther Leslie, looks like there is a bit of reading in my future.

Merrie Melodies and Looney Tunes

Oh boy, strap in folks, this one is a lot to explain. With a franchise as massive and ever-present as the Looney Tunes, it makes sense that there would be some cartoons in this series that have been banned, most notably the "Censored Eleven". A series of shorts from 1931 to 1944 that were pulled due to racist depictions of African and Black American people. Three of the eleven shorts are in the public domain as of now, and no official release has been made, though one has been planned since 2010. Other banned shorts include "Inki and the Minah Bird", the 1969 short "Injun Trouble", and all Speedy Gonzales shorts, though those were only temporarily banned due to backlash from fans, which included Latin American citizens.

Minions: The Rise of Gru

No, I'm not talking about the teens banned from theatre screenings, I'm talking about the movie itself. We have another Middle Eastern ban here, this time solely in Lebanon, and frankly I don't see why. The article I linked to makes claims it's due to homosexuality and a character who is portrayed as an evil nun, but no official statement has been given. I find it odd that this was the movie that Lebanon alone banned, like really? An Illumination movie was banned? Illumination movies are barely worth watching, let alone banning.

Onward

Yep, Onward was banned too, and take a wild guess where and why. Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have all banned the movie due to a minor lesbian character in the film. I want to give props to Disney for not cutting the character for these markets, but like... I remember the whole mess this movie spawned because the character was touted as "Disney's first openly gay character", and let's just say nobody bought it, I feel like banning this movie for this is just giving Disney what they wanted, an easy defense for anyone criticizing the character. "Who cares this character only appeared on screen for a minute and never appeared or was mentioned again? She is the reason this movie is banned in four countries, so we're clearly doing something right!"

I would be remiss if I did not share this article I found on Out about the timeline of Disney's 17 "First Gay Characters", which has some legitimate criticism of the character in question.

Persepolis

Probably the least shocking entry on this list... or the second least shocking, Persepolis was banned in, wait for it, Lebanon, at least initially. The movie, an adaptation of Marjane Satrapi's autobiographic comic, was banned during a political crisis apparently, and the movie is about Marjane's life during the 1979 Iranian Revolution. Lebanese authorities banned it out of fear of how it would effect the political situation there, however, due to some outcry the ban was reversed not too long after. Some claim that the ban was made more to please Iran than protecting Lebanon. If you have the opportunity, I definitely recommend reading the original book, I think it is one of the defining comic and graphic novels of its time.

Popeye the Sailor

Yep, a number of Popeye shorts were also banned, and for largely the same reasons as the Looney Tunes bans. The thing is that Popeye was largely used in Propaganda cartoons so, a lot of the racial stereotypes are a result of the War, this is not to excuse the shorts, this is to provide historical context. Other reasons the shorts were pulled include a couple with Native American stereotypes, and a short where Popeye actually murdered someone. A total of nine Popeye shorts are not available on HBO Max, but you may be able to find them online.

The Prince of Egypt

Yep, The Prince of Egypt is banned, in three countries too. To begin with, the movie is, ironically enough, banned in Egypt. The movie is, allegedly, viewed as revisionist history that distorts Egyptian history and shows bias against Arabic people, with one Egyptian director calling it "Poisoned Honey". The movie was also banned in Malaysia, with the Film Censorship Board chairman stating that they "Found it insensitive for religious and moral reasons". Malaysia has a majority Muslim population. The biggest surprise for me was that the movie is also banned in the Maldives. Islamic custom has a rule about portrayals of prophets, so the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs took offense at the film's depiction of Moses. I gotta say, I never would have expected The Prince of Egypt to be banned more than once, and in only one Middle Eastern country too, that might be the most surprising thing to me.

Raggedy Ann and Raggedy Andy*

Here's another short film, and another one I can't find any confirmation on. No, we're not talking about the 1977 Musical Adventure, this is a 1941 short film by Fleischer Studios. Usually, what I do when I can't find a source over Google, I'll turn to Wikipedia and see what they source and look that up. In this case, they source the book "Raggedy Ann and Johnny Gruelle: A Bibliography of Published Works" by Patricia Hall, but I did some basic keyword searching and nothing came up, so take this one as another dubious claim, but if this story is true, it's actually one of the funnier stories here, so I'm gonna share it, under the caveat that this story may not actually be completely factual.

Apparently, this short film was suspended in its initial release because this short kind of has a different interpretation of Raggedy Ann and Andy's relationship. There is no polite way to put this, the short kind of depicts the two as being lovers instead of siblings, so one could easily see the short as incestuous. Again, I can't find any confirmation of this, but the story is kind of funny, so I'm sharing it anyway.

Red Hot Riding Hood*

Another short film ban, this time with an asterisk attached. Red Hot Riding Hood, the famous Tex Avery cartoon, was banned from televised broadcasting due to the Television Code, which was a set of ethical standards for television from 1952 until 1983. Again, I don't have any confirmation on this one, sources on Wikipedia are not links, and Google is just turning up a bunch of stuff about the original Little Red Riding Hood story, but I'm inclined to believe this one because, it just makes a lot of sense.

Sausage Party*

Another one to chalk up to the "Can't find confirmation but it's believable enough" category of "Dubious claims", but apparently the raunchy, controversial adult comedy Sausage Party is banned in Kuwait for indecency. Again, no confirmation here, but I can believe it.

I should also talk about the boycott some people had over the film for the terrible working conditions for the animators, but that isn't really a "ban" per se, maybe I'll do another blog where I talk about movies that have been boycotted.

Shrek 2

Yes, Shrek 2 was banned, and this time I have found receipts. Of all the countries to ban Shrek 2 of all movies, Israel was the ones to do it, temporarily. See, in the Hebrew dub of the movie, they make a joke at the expense of Israeli singer David Daor, and Israeli court said that the joke had to be removed. What was the joke? The joke was that David Daor is a high pitched singer, so use your imagination. Honestly, I'm just kind of amused that Israel banned Shrek 2, then I remember what Israel is doing and I'm less amused.

The Simpsons Movie

Hey, one of the least surprising entries on this list! So, why was The Simpsons Movie banned? Was it because of the plot about a government conspiracy? The irreverent satire? Bart's nude skateboarding misadventure? Shockingly no, it was banned allegedly for the colour palette. The Simpsons Movie was banned in Myanmar/Burma, because the country had a rebel group whose flag was prominently red and yellow, and the defining colour of The Simpsons is yellow, and there is a fair amount of red in the movie. This is another case of "There's a lot of political climate reasons involved that I am  nowhere near well-equipped enough to go into detail on" and also another case of "The reason is really ridiculous and silly", really they could have just listed any other reason and I'm sure everyone would have bought it, why did they have to single out the colour palette?

The Skeleton Dance*

Okay, this one is gonna be super quick and easy to talk about. In a March, 1931 New York Times Article, they reported that the 1929 Silly Symphony cartoon was banned in Denmark for being "Too Macabre". Unfortunately, the archived article link doesn't seem to work for me. Plus, it's a New York Times article, not a Danish news article.

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

Ladies, gentlemen and everyone outside the gender binary, the least shocking film ban on this list. Shockingly, the movie wasn't banned (Entirely) for the 399 uses of profanity, on screen visual of a giant talking clitoris, or the irreverent satire (Not being facetious with my wording there), it was banned in Iraq and Kuwait for its depiction of Saddam Hussein. In fact, the TV series itself is banned in Kuwait, which apparently led to the creation of their own show titled Block 13, I imagine it would be like any other extremist knock-off of any other show.

Apparently, as he was being held by US Marines, Saddam Hussein was actually forced to watch this movie. I don't know how legitimate that claim is, but if I were wanting to torture someone, making them watch a movie that makes a mocking depiction of them is probably something I would do,

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Yep, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse was banned too. Another film band that pretty much sweeps the Middle East. You've probably heard this story when it was new, but countries like the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Lebanon, Egypt, Kuwait and the like all pulled this movie from their theatres, most likely due to a "Protect Trans Kids" flag and some of the trans symbolism in the movie. Look, I don't even know where to go from here, so... Trans Lives Matter, Queer Lives Matter, Queerphobes Die Mad.

That Time I Got Reincarnated As a Slime: The Movie - Scarlet Bond*

Another potentially dubious claim, but there is some anecdotal evidence to back this one up. Apparently, Scarlet Bond is banned in, once again, Kuwait, primarily for the protagonist, Rimuru Tempest, being genderless. Wikipedia doesn't give us any sources, and I couldn't find anything to hard confirm this, however, Kuwait did ban the movie "Talk to Me" allegedly because of actor Zoe Terakes, a Non-Binary Transmasculine person. On top of that, Russia apparently banned a bunch if Isekai Anime, which does include That Time I Got Reincarnated As A Slime, so with all that information, I can believe that Kuwait banned a movie for having a genderless protagonist, but there's no official evidence to back up this claim, at least none that I have found, so it's still in the dubious zone.

Tom & Jerry

This is our last entry for short films on this list, but there have been quite a few cases where Tom and Jerry shorts have been pulled, and for different reasons.

The short "Heavenly Puss" is banned in the Middle East and Brazil. Brazil also banned the short "The Two Mousketeers", as did Morocco, which also banned the short "Tot Watchers". The shorts "Calypso Cat" and "Jerry, Jerry, Quite Contrary" are both banned in the Middle East. The shorts "Mouse Cleaning" and "Casanova Cat" were edited for American broadcasts. The short "The Mouse from H.U.N.G.E.R." is pulled from American broadcast due to concerns over flickering lights causing epileptic seizures. I would be remiss if I did not mention the infamous short "Blue Cat Clues" which has been pulled from American airings due to its content, and the first Tom and Jerry short "Puss Gets the Boots" faced heavy censorship for future airings.

There are more bans, pulled airings and censorship to Tom & Jerry shorts, including a case of legal disputes for an entire showrunner's run of shorts, but I'm gonna leave it here.

Toy Story 2

Okay, this one isn't a ban, but the story is kind of hilarious. Toy Story 2 had a scene cut from the film, which scene? One of the end credits bloopers. The blooper scene where Pete is talking about getting a role for two Barbie dolls was cut from the movie entirely after the #MeToo movement. Queerphobia, political unrest and sexual misconduct, this blog has been a barrel of laughs hasn't it? I find it kind of funny that they went out of their way to cut an end credits blooper scene, but considering that John Lasseter had some allegations thrown his way, I can't really say I blame them.

Turning Red*

Great, like we need another controversy for Turning Red. At the very least, this is another dubious claim, probably due to misinterpreting sources. The Wikipedia article on Films Banned in China claims that China refused to give this movie a classification due to the indecent content, and it links two sources. A Radii article that talks about the representation of Chinese people in the movie, and a Bustle article that says nothing about any bans or China at all.

There is another claim it's banned in Kuwait, but I couldn't find anything to hard confirm that, frankly I don't think this movie needs anymore controversies surrounding it.

Waltz with Bashir

Well this one is gonna be a fun one, Waltz with Bashir, the 2008 Israeli animated docudrama was banned in a few Arab countries, most notably Lebanon. To start with, Lebanon was boycotting Israeli products at the time (I can't imagine why), and secondly, the movie is about a man recounting his experience as a soldier in the 1982 Lebanon War and the Sabra and Shatila massacre.

That all being said, there are some people in Lebanon who praise the film, with activist Lokman Slim saying that he felt jealous about it.

Winnie-the-Pooh

Well, coincidentally, we've saved the funniest ban for last. You have definitely heard of this before, but just in case you haven't, Winnie the Pooh, the character, has been banned in China, including Hong Kong and Macau, because he was a meme used to mock Chinese President Xi Jingping. Like, frankly, I don't even know what to say about this, you literally banned Winnie the Pooh from your countries media for a meme, that would be like Donald Trump banning Hello Kitty because people kept comparing him to Badtz-Maru, or if Justin Trudeau banned Doonesbury because it was written by Garry Trudeau. Seriously, this might be the stupidest ban on this entire list.

To reiterate, the point of this blog was predominately for educational purposes, as when we talk about film history, we tend to overlook minor reactions to the films. Also, I want to make the statement that this is not an indictment on any of the countries mentioned or their people, bans start at positions of power, bigotry of any kind will not be tolerated here.

Throughout this list, we've seen some films banned for stupid reasons, and some films banned and censored for less than stupid reasons. If I had to pick the stupidest bans, I think it would be The Bahamas banning Demon Slayer, China banning Winnie the Pooh, and Israel temporarily banning Shrek 2. Of course, there are a few dubious claims on here as well, I should do the proper journalism thing and just cut them, but I wanted to keep them up here because, first of all, if these bans are legitimate, they should be known about, and second, if these bans aren't legitimate, then it's a good lesson on being able to verify your sources, if I found an entry on this list to be dubious, I did mark it as such, but keep in mind, I am human, I make mistakes, so something may have slipped through the cracks.

This blog took a lot out of me.

The Hero of Color City (2014) - Why Do I Do This?

Well, we're getting there, it's almost the end of the year and burnout is setting in, among a bunch of other things because the second half of this year was to put it mildly, not very good for me, so if it seems like I just picked this no name, no audience, no anything movie because it was available on Tubi, looked like a bad movie, and is less than an hour and a half, you'd be right. Usually I try to have some kind of reason I chose a movie to review, but I'm gonna be honest I am very much looking forward to that January off of movie reviews so forgive me if I need something that looks like an easy target. I have reviewed a couple movies that were available on Tubi, some good, some not, let's see where this one falls.

The plot of this movie is Foodfight, and I am only half-kidding when I say that. The movie follows a bunch of crayons as they enter the world of Color City during the night time when their owner falls asleep. Two of the young kid's sketches enters the world and begins to cause trouble by blocking the rainbow waterfall that gives all the crayons their colour, and a few of the crayons, including the timid and afraid of everything Yellow, because fear and anxiety are the colours I associate with Yellow, but I digress, must travel through dangerous lands to reach the top of the waterfall and stop all the crayons from losing their colours. Straight up, this movie is boring, it doesn't tell it's story in an interesting or creative way, and there are a couple scenes that just drag on for an unnecessarily long time. I don't mind movies with unoriginal plots, but you got to have some kind of hook or twist, Klaus had great character arcs, this movie has the bare basics.

The animation of this movie is ugly, it's kind of got that Garfield Gets Real quality to it where it just looks really off, but I would actually argue this movie as being worse looking, because how do you make crayons look ugly? The whole movie has that cheap CG look to it that looks gummy, like those gummy candies of like Krabby Patties and stuff, or like a cross between plasticine and gummy bears, I dunno it just never looked good to me. It doesn't help that lip sync is only about half-synced to the dialogue, it's synced in a way that you can almost pretend that it's properly synced but if you're paying any kind of attention you can tell it isn't. I will say that it is bright and colourful, and on some level I guess I should be less critical of movies that are obviously made under a tight budget, except first-off, I can't find a budget for this movie so I can't definitively state if it is a budget movie, and secondly a limited budget does not excuse the fact that they made tipped cylinders look absolutely awful, I'm sure most studios can make an animated anthropomorphic crayon that isn't completely ugly.

I have to assume that this movie had a decent budget because the voice cast has some fairly recognizable names, okay they aren't the most expensive names in the industry but Christina Ricci, Owen Wilson and Wayne Brady aren't nobodies, plus veteran voice actors like Jess Harnell, E.G. Daily, David Kaye, Craig Ferguson and Tara Strong among others, then again I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't much out of this movie either. I'm gonna be honest, Christina Ricci is terrible in this movie, she's done some voice acting prior and since, so I'm going to assume that she was not given the best direction, but she just doesn't give good reads at all. She voices the main character so she is the main voice we hear, though her singing voice is done by Tara Strong, pretty obviously to be honest, it sounds exactly like Twilight Sparkle.

It doesn't help much that the characters aren't that interesting. Like I said before, the choice to make Yellow the timid and anxious one is, not entirely out of keeping with colour theory, but I mostly equate yellow with cheer and excitement. Other than that, you have your standard geeky nerd, your doom and gloom fun-sponge, your hot-headed and sarcastic jerk with a soft spot, and hey, a geeky know-it-all professor who sounds like Jerry Lewis? Umm... Simpsons did it? They do give some of the characters arcs, but they're very basic, and in some cases it doesn't even seem like they had any kind of change in character. I think the only thing that would have made this movie worse is if this was theatrically released in any capacity, because apparently it was given a limited theatrical release.

Sometimes, to get back on track, you gotta hit an easy target, and frankly I almost feel bad for criticizing this movie, it's such an easy target. It almost feels like I'm punching down, like this movie is not something attached to a massive multi-media franchise, it's not from a major animation or film studio, it's not an independent project that is overly confused and tries to be something more than the creator is capable of, but by the same token, it really isn't anything. It's a bland story with bland characters and ugly animation, like come on, I couldn't have picked an easier target if I tried, outside of some of those knock-off animated movies from Vídeo Brinquedo or WowNow Entertainment. Is this movie one of the worst? Well... I guess it's ultimately harmless, I can't see this being really offensive to anyone outside of those who think animation is more than a tool for keeping little kids quiet, and honestly even at that level I can't muster that much ire towards this movie, there just isn't anything to get mad at. I don't recommend this movie, but at the same time, if you desperately need something to keep your little ones quiet, well I can think of worse movies.

What is the Case with 2024's Animated Line-up?

There has been something really nagging at me as of late, and if you've read some of my previous First Impressions posts this year, you'd know what it is. The animated line-up of 2024 has been, in my opinion anyway, severely mediocre at best... at least for the first half or so of the year. Something about the releases has just made me question, "Am I becoming a jaded snob?", like there really is nothing I can get really upset about with movies like Saving Bikini Bottom or The Garfield Movie, I haven't really watched anything that I felt was an insult to animation, to be fair that notion is a bit of hyperbole, but you get the idea right? To me, the majority of the "Bad" animated films this year have been more on the "Mediocre" side of bad, which wouldn't be an issue, except that until recently, similar could be said about the good movies too. Ultraman: Rising and Thelma the Unicorn are not bad movies in and of themselves, but are they really that good?

I think I know what the ultimate problem is, 2022 absolutely spoiled me. There was just something magical about that year, the good movies were really good, and even the bad movies were interesting to talk about. Off the top of my head, 2022 was just filled with releases like Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio, The Bad Guys, The Sea Beast, Apollo 10½, Wendell & Wild, and honestly I'll even throw a bone to stuff like Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers, Paws of Fury, even Luck. 2022 was not a dull or empty year for animation fans, but why? Well, I think it's partly for two main reasons, firstly, this was 2022. In 2020, there was a global pandemic that basically shut everything down, and in that time, people got to do something they almost never did in this hustle and bustle work culture we've created, they got to relax for a couple days. Being a creative type, I know just how good the power of relaxing can be for your creativity, so finally getting that chance to properly relax must have been so relieving to a lot of these writers and directors, so throughout 2020 and 2021 they got to work and polish up these ideas of theirs and then voila, 2022 came around.

I think the other big thing to keep in mind is, this is the 2020s. I write for a living, I'm really good at this! Okay, so the 2010s were a big game changing decade for animation, there was a new movie studio coming in that was gonna rival Disney and DreamWorks, Cartoon Network released two major cartoons that changed the landscape, Adventure Time and Regular Show, there was this itty bitty minor show that completely blew up called Friendship is Magic, and through the 2010s it was very clear that the animation landscape was changing. Shows like Steven Universe, Gravity Falls, The Amazing World of Gumball, Over the Garden Wall, Sonic Boom, Teen Titans Go!, Rick and Morty, BoJack Horseman, Bob's Burgers, Dan Vs., OK K.O.!, Ultimate Spider-Man, DuckTales, this was a new era of animation, and it began with the new decade. On top of that, internet animation was becoming bigger, streaming was becoming bigger, and there was this little movie that released at towards tail-end of the decade, a movie that would become one of the most influential pieces of animation of all time; Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. So it would make absolute sense that the influence of the animation from the 2010s would seep into the projects of the 2020s.

The 2020s has the potential to be an amazing decade for animation, and as of now we're still pretty early in the decade so it still does, so... why aren't we reaching that potential? I think a lot of people will make the same arguments, "We're gonna get peaks and valleys", "It takes time to make a movie", "Not every year is gonna be golden", and I understand those points, I do, but they explain nothing. Yes, it does take plenty of time to make an animated movie, but as we have learned with The Thief and the Cobbler, time does not make a good movie automatically, so what is ultimately the reason? Why aren't films like Thelma the Unicorn or Orion and the Dark really reaching those heights? Again, it is easy for me to say "2022 was a big year and it gave me a lot of expectations", but I think there is a little bit more to it than that.

There has been a massive problem that goes beyond animation. When Technology becomes better, more possibilities are open, meaning more trends are started, the problem is that it is easy in the moment to call something a "Trend Setter", something that is wholly different and unique, but art trends and business trends are not the same thing, when something like Into the Spider-Verse comes out, artists see it as something grand, the way the stylization brings the characters and world to life, thus breathing new life into the story. Businessmen however, they tend to view it differently, they see that this popular character got a movie that is making big bucks and getting a lot of attention, so they want to see how far this trend will go, why do you think The Minecraft Movie is live action? are we really shocked they decided to do that after all the attention that the Sonic the Hedgehog movie got?

Simply put, I believe we're in something of a transitionary period, 2022 was kind of an outlier of perfect, and not so perfect, ideas that were being thought at the perfect time, looking back, I should not have been surprised that the best movies were coming from Netflix of all places. I think the big problem is that nobody is quite sure where exactly to go from here, the world of stylized animation is a great place to explore, but it might be emptier than we'd like it to be. I remember watching Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, and noting that the action scenes were definitely influenced by the stylized look of movies like Spider-Verse or The Bad Guys, but I wouldn't say that Puss in Boots is a heavily stylized movie, it looks like any other DreamWorks production. I do think we'll be seeing a lot more movies with stylized CG animation in the future, but I think a lot more of them will be Puss in Boots instead of Spider-Verse, and it's because we're at a point where the artists have to figure out the "how" of it, and that is always the difficult part.

To be absolutely fair, Transformers One, The Wild Robot and Piece by Piece, that Lego Pharrell Williams documentary, have been pretty good, so I think we are getting back on track. We are seeing the influence of the 2010s and of 2022 starting to really take form. Piece by Piece, a documentary told via Lego animation is a unique idea, we don't see many animated documentaries out there. The Wild Robot was a stylized movie, and Transformers One, well it was just really good, and that's great too. I'm really hoping that 2024 is the last really dry spell of animated features, I hope 2025 begins to really shape a new era of animation in theatres. We can argue about whether the 2020s have been a good decade for animation, but I hope it will be as interesting as the 2010s.

Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island (1998) - A Perfect Halloween Feature

Scooby-Doo Movies are pretty much a dime a dozen, wow that line feels familiar. Back all the way in December of 2018, I had the itching to watch a couple movies that I was nostalgic about, that is what pretty much started this blog. The second movie I ever reviewed here was Scooby-Doo and the Ghoul School, a charming, if a little sloppy Television Film. However, it wasn't until the late 1990s and early 2000s that Scooby-Doo movies would become dominating, all starting with Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island in 1998, I'm actually not that much older than this movie. I think it's about time that I give a Scooby-Doo movie a better written review, and it should be perfect for Halloween.

The movie actually takes place in a bit of a time jump, if the Mystery Gang is high-school age in the original show, here they're all adults. Daphne, being fed up with how every mystery they solve ended up being a guy in a mask, takes on a different job as a TV Reporter, with Fred being her cameraman. While Daphne desires to find a real ghost, Fred gets the old gang back together as they explore the hauntings of New Orleans. After a montage of duds, they get a tip from a woman named Lena that a local island holds a real haunted house. I like that the plot is not too out of the ordinary for a Scooby-Doo episode, there is still a mystery and still a bunch of ghouls, only this time, they aren't guys in masks this time... well by some technicality the bad guys are people in a mask, but spoilers. The movie really is asking, "What would happen if the Mystery Gang was up against real monsters?" and I think they nailed it.

None of the characters feel out of character here, Velma is still the inquisitive one, Fred has a thing where he always tries to find logical explanations to everything, which is fitting since he's seen all of this before, so, being one of the more logical of the crew, he would try to find logic in everything. Shaggy and Scooby are still Shaggy and Scooby, and Daphne had a bit of an upgrade, going back to the original 1969 series (Yes, Scooby-Doo is that old) I really do struggle to think of what Daphne offers to the group, but in this movie she is very much taking charge, you could say that she's slipped into the leader role of the gang, it's actually kind of refreshing, and it makes sense given the trajectory of the character arcs. Daphne, going into TV hosting, would be taking more a lead role in this case. On top of that, we have some new characters, and I like that they throw red herrings our way with them, though I can't spill too much here, again spoilers.

One thing I also want to comment on is the voice cast, because this is probably as good of a voice cast for the Mystery Gang as possible, Frank Welker being the only person to reprise his role from the original show, and most of the other cast being replaced for one reason or another. Billy West steps in as Shaggy, B. J. Ward steps in as Velma, and Mary Kay Bergman might be my favourite Daphne, I'll have to do a lot of comparisons, but she is currently at the top for me. Don Messick, the original voice of Scooby-Doo, passed away in 1997, so he was the only original actor they couldn't bring back with Casey Kasem refusing to reprise the role unless they made some changes to Shaggy's character (Honestly, it sounds like he was being a bit of a diva), Heather North being replaced after only a day of recording, and Nicole Jaffe being in retirement at this period of time. Anyway, Scott Innes steps in as Scooby-Doo in this movie, and he's pretty good, I grew up with Frank Welker being Scooby, but Scott does a good job. Other voice actors like Adrienne Barbeau, Tara Strong, Cam Clarke and Jim Cummings all do great jobs, and a Mark Hamill cameo is always admired.

What is also worth admiring is the animation, done by Japanese Studio Mook Animation. I have said before that going Direct-to-Video or DVD is usually a better option for movies based on cartoons, because it allows them to keep the style they have without having to give it that "Cinematic Shine", I think this movie is a good balance of the two. It definitely looks better than any other Scooby-Doo product prior, and that is a bit of a curse as much as a blessing. The animation looks great, the zombies look wonderfully decayed, but, and I am fully aware this may just be because I've been reading Uzumaki lately, there were some scenes that did squick me out a little. I wouldn't say this movie is entirely on par with the work of Junji Ito, but there is some light body-horror in here. There were multiple times throughout this movie I just had to squirm and go "Ick!", but in this case I am willing to say that it is a good thing.

And because I know some people will be shocked if I don't mention it, the music in this movie is pretty great. Everyone goes crazy for the song "It's Terror Time Again" by Skycycle, and yeah, it is a pretty great song, though I also quite like "The Ghost Is Here", I think that one should also be put on some Halloween Playlists.

Honestly, I can list Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island as another movie that I am absolutely shocked was as good as it was, I always heard it was good, but I just figured it was good " by Scooby-Doo standards" which by this point has gotten pretty abysmal, but I'll be damned this one was actually good. A solid mystery, great animation, good amount of light-horrors, a rocking soundtrack, and the delightful characters that we've all grown to... well tolerate at this point, but loved back then. I really do think this is a great movie to put alongside stuff like Hocus Pocus or Coraline for a solid Halloween movie night. I'd say it's not as creepy as Coraline, but I'm not a good judge for that considering. Still, if you are tired of the Hocus Pocus and Corpse Bride and you haven't given this movie a chance, put it on, I think you'll be shockingly surprised.